Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;7(6):4051–4060. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13014

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for the association with the severity of tricuspid regurgitation

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR CI P OR CI P
Age 1.05 1.03–1.06 <0.01 1.05 1.03–1.07 <0.01
Male 0.83 0.63–1.10 0.20
HT 0.77 0.58–1.02 0.07 0.82 0.48–1.40 0.47
DM 0.59 0.43–0.82 <0.01 0.65 0.37–1.16 0.14
HL 0.48 0.36–0.66 <0.01 0.55 0.33–0.93 0.02
AF 6.57 4.90–8.80 <0.01 4.71 3.89–7.67 <0.01
LVEDV 1.00 1.00–1.01 0.07 1.02 1.00–1.03 0.02
LV mass 1.00 0.99–1.00 <0.01 0.99 0.99–1.00 0.01
LVEF 0.94 0.92–0.97 <0.01 0.96 0.92–1.00 0.07
RVSP 1.05 1.03–1.06 <0.01 1.04 1.02–1.06 <0.01
MR ≥ 2 1.41 0.92–2.17 0.11
AR ≥ 2 1.49 0.86–2.58 0.16
HF stage 2.06 1.55–2.73 <0.01 1.24 0.76–2.05 0.39

AF, atrial fibrillation; AR, aortic regurgitation; CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; HL, hyperlipidaemia; HT, hypertension; LV, left ventricular; LVEDV, left ventricular end‐diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MR, mitral regurgitation; OR, odds ratio; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure.

Those with P value < 0.05 were in bold which means the variable is significant.