Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2017 Jul 21;19(15):4122–4125. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01934

Table 1.

Optimization of global hydrogenation conditions

s. no GH substrate Pd% (w/w) solvent time (h) product ratioa (5a:6a:7) or (5b:6b) yield % of 1a/1b (over 2 steps)
1 4a 40 MeOH:EtOAc (1:1) 20 61:0:39 ndc
2 4a 40 MeOH:EtOAc (1:1) 4 incomplete reaction ndc
3 4a 40 MeOH:H2O (1:1) 4 50:0:50 ndc
4 4a 40 t-BuOH:H2O (1:1) 4 67:0:33 ndc
5 4a 30 t-BuOH:H2O (1:1) 1.5 56:44:0 ndc
6 4a 30 t-BuOH:H2O (1:1) 3.0 90:10:0 60%
7 4a 30 t-BuOH:H2O (1:1) 3.5 83:0:17 ndc
8 4c 100 MeOH:EtOAc (1:1) 72 68%b ndc
9 4c 100 tBuOH:H2O (1:1) 16 17:83 ndc
10 4c 100 MeOH:H2O (5:1) 24 95:5 61%
11 4c 50 MeOH:H2O (5:1) 72 90:10 ndc
a

based on 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture filtered over celite;

b

isolated yield;

c

nd –not determined, the compound was not used to make 1a/1b.