Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 4;31(1):131–138. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07097-w

Table 1.

Pediatric patient positioning without a baby cradle or vacuum cushion: comparison of table height deviation for radiographers and 3D camera

Body part Abdomen Head Thorax-abdomen Thorax All body parts combined
Total number of patients without a baby cradle or vacuum cushion 22 (15%) 46 (31%) 14 (9%) 67 (45%) 149 (100%)
Table height determined by radiographers
  Median of absolute table height deviation, mm 10.2 [16.8] 16.4 [16.6] 4.1 [5.1] 9.7 [9.7] 10.3 [12.6]
 Patients positioned higher than isocenter, n (%) 5 (23%) 15 (33%) 2 (14%) 19 (28%) 41 (28%)
  Patients positioned lower than isocenter, n (%) 17 (77%) 31 (67%) 12 (86%) 48 (72%) 108 (72%)
  Largest deviation, mm (age in years) 80.5 (13 years) 44.9 (3 years) 31.1 (12 years) 54.3 (11 years)
Table height determined by 3D camera
  Median of absolute table height deviation, mm 3.1 [4.7] 3.9 [6.3] 2.2 [4.3] 4.8 [6.7] 3.7 [5.8]
  Patients positioned higher than isocenter, n (%) 8 (36%) 22 (48%) 6 (43%) 33 (49%) 69 (46%)
  Patients positioned lower than isocenter, n (%) 14 (64%) 24 (52%) 8 (57%) 34 (51%) 80 (54%)
  Largest deviation, mm (age in years) 18.2 (15 years) − 30.1 (10 years) − 13.5 (13 years) − 25.4 (3 years)
p value median absolute table height deviation (3D camera versus radiographer) < 0.005 < 0.005 0.064 < 0.005 < 0.005

Data are numbers (%) and median [interquartile range]

Negative deviation numbers: patient positioned higher than isocenter

Positive deviation numbers: patient positioned lower than isocenter