Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 22;83(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11538-020-00827-7

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Steady-state distribution of mature RNA for two different genes in yeast. We compare the distribution obtained from SSA (dots) to the perturbative approximation in Eq. (33) (solid lines) for two different genes. In a, we consider the PDR5 gene, fixing the parameters as in Fig. 2: su=0.44/min, sb=4.7/min, r=6.7/min, d=0.01/min, and T=4.5 min. The degradation rate of mature RNA takes the values dm=0.04,0.10,0.40/min; note that the experimental value is dm=0.04/min. In b, we consider the DOA1 gene, fixing the parameters as in Fig. 3: su=0.7/min, sb=0.12/min, r=0.14/min, d=0.01/min, and T=2.9 min. The degradation rate of mature RNA again takes the values dm=0.04,0.10,0.40/min; the experimental value is dm=0.05/min. For both genes, the agreement between SSA and our perturbative approximation increases with k/dm, as expected, since Eq. (33) is derived under the assumption that kdm. Note that the distribution is practically independent of L, since Eq. (33) depends on L only through μL, which for small premature detachment rates d implies μL1 for any L (Color figure online)