Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;77(1):207–220. doi: 10.1111/jan.14583

Table 1.

Variables, constructs, and psychometric properties of LEON survey scales

Variable Construct Scale/measure Measurement Scoring Reliability Validity
Independent 1. Resonant leadership Resonant leadership scale (Estabrooks et al., 2009) 10 items measuring components of resonant leadership Likert scale (1–5) for each item. Means of those who answered (1)– (5) used as resonant leadership score High internal consistency for total scale α = 0.95

Face/content validity

Correlations between variables above 0.5, most above 0.6.

Independent 2. Leader–member exchange Leader–member Exchange (LMX‐7) Graen and Uhl‐Bien (1995) 7 items measuring the satisfaction of employees with their relationship with their supervisor Likert scale (1–5) for each item Internal consistency from the member's perspective (α = 0.89) Reported to have predictive validity
Independent 3. Perceived Organisation Support Perception of Organisational Support (POS) (Eisenberger et al., 1997) 8 items measuring perception of organizational support Likert scale (7–1) for each item High internal reliability α = 0.90 and goodness of fit α = 0.94 Reported to have discriminant validity
Independent 4. Work Engagement Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) (Schaufeli et al., 2006) 9 items measuring three factors of work engagement; vigour, dedication, and absorption Likert scale (0–6) for each item High internal reliability α = 0.89–0.97 Factorial validity variances between countries for and internal consistency (α = 0.60 to 0.88, respectively, median = 0.77).
Dependant 5. Perception of unit care quality Perceptions of unit care quality Aiken et al. (2001) and Aiken et al. (2002) 4 items measuring perceptions of care on their unit Likert scale (1–4) for 3 items and 1–3 for 1 item Not reported
Marker 6. Willingness to try new food products DSI Willingness to try new food products; DSI scale Goldsmith and Hofacker (1991) adapted by Barcellos et al. (2009) 6 items Likert scale (1–5) for each item Good reliability in Brazil (α = 0.80) and in the UK (α = 0.78). Reported to have predictive validity
Dependant 7. Patient safety Falls (Purdy et al., 2010) Number of falls recorded by the institution Number per 1,000 bed days
Dependant 8. Patient satisfaction Friends and Family Test (Department of Health, 2013). 1 item measuring likelihood to recommend for similar care or treatment Percentage of promoters (score 5) over detractors (scores 1 & 2) across a 5‐point scale.