TABLE 2.
Group A: Computerized CR (n = 48) | Group B: Exercises at Home (n = 44) | Group C: Phone Call (n = 51) | P a | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCI T0 | 33.2 (13.2) | 35.4 (15.6) | 34.1 (13.6) | .66 |
PCI T1 | 40.8 (11.8) | 44.0 (16.1) | 44.4 (12.2) | |
PCI T2 | 47.5 (11.8) | 47.4 (17.1) | 44.2 (12.5) | |
PCI T3 b | 49.0 (12.9) | 45.2 (16.5) | 43.5 (12.9) | |
7‐Point improvement in PCI score between T0 and T3, n (%) b | 36 (75.0) | 26 (59.1) | 29 (56.9) | .13 |
PCI: difference between T0 and T3 b | 16.3 (14.7) | 11.1 (14.8) | 9.1 (12.6) | .02 |
PCA: difference between T0 and T3 b | 5.3 (5.6) | 1.8 (5.3) | 2.7 (4.3) | <.01 |
FACT impact on QOL: difference between T0 and T3 b | 5.1 (5.4) | 2.6 (4.1) | 3.8 (3.9) | .01 |
FACT comments from others: difference between T0 and T3 b | 2.7 (3.6) | 1.0 (4.1) | 1.6 (2.8) | .05 |
Abbreviations: CR, cognitive rehabilitation; FACT‐Cog, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Cognitive Function; PCA, perceived cognitive abilities; PCI, perceived cognitive impairments; QOL, quality of life; T0, baseline; T1, at 1 month; T2, at 2 months; T3, at the end of the 3‐month program.
All values are presented as mean (SD) unless noted otherwise.
Kruskal‐Wallis or Fisher's exact test. Significant values appear in boldface type.
Missing = 24 (14.4%).