Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 20;62(6):688–698. doi: 10.1002/mus.27041

TABLE 3.

Comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the vacuum‐assisted biopsy system with the Bergstrom and open biopsy methods

Advantages Disadvantages
Vacuum‐assisted core needle biopsy
  • <3 mm scar with no sutures needed

  • Consistent sample sizes and quality

  • Disposable needles

  • One operator to perform

  • 30 mm depth insertion needed

  • Expensive disposable needles

Bergstrom
  • Small <1 cm scar, one suture needed 11

  • Inexpensive reusable device

  • Variable in sample size

  • More variable in sample distortion 25

  • Technically more challenging to perform as requires two operators 11

  • Recovery may be 6 d 11

  • May be more painful than vacuum‐assisted method 22

Bergstrom or

vacuum‐assisted core needle biopsy

  • May be performed in a clinic room

  • Shorter two‐day recovery time

  • Less need for sedation

  • Multiple cores may be obtained

  • Anatomic structures not directly visualized

  • Smaller size biopsies may require multiple cores for adequate specimen collection

  • Small/deep muscles difficult to biopsy

Open biopsy
  • Anatomic structures directly visualized 23

  • Larger contiguous amounts of tissue can be obtained 12

  • Smaller muscles may be biopsied 23

  • Sutures required, prolonging recovery, and limiting activity for 10‐14 d 23 , 24

  • DMD patients may have an poor aesthetic appearance from healed 5 cm scar

  • Operating room likely required

  • Greater need for sedation