Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;13(24):6643–6650. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202002274

Table 1.

Summary of the composition data obtained by EDX, ECA, and ICP analyses and data extracted from physisorption analyses.

Sample

EDX/ECA [wt %]

SSABET [c]

V T [d]

Pore diameter[e]

CO2 adsorption[f]

C

N

O

H[a]

Zn[b]

C/N

[m2 g−1]

[cm3 g−1]

[nm]

[mmol g−1]

cG@500‐SZ10

47.7/ 38.0

43.0/ 35.0

3.4/ 14.9

1.6

2.1

1.1/ 1.1

8

1.6

cG@600‐SZ10

51.7/ 38.0

41.0/ 34.0

7.2/ 17.0

3.0

2.7

1.3/ 1.1

852

0.41 (0.42)

3.9

cG@700‐SZ10

46.6

42.4

4.4

4.0

1.1

812

0.38 (0.43)

1.2 (1.3)

3.9

cG@800‐SZ10

81.2/ 72.0

11.0/ 12.0

6.7/ 10.8

1.0

0.3

7.4/ 6.5

1982

1.40 (1.42)

4.1 (3.6)–(1.7)

4.7

[a] Only by ECA. [b] From inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP‐OES). [c] Specific surface area obtained by applying the Brunauer‐Emmett‐Teller (BET) method to N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K. [d] Total pore volume (V T ) calculated by DFT, in parentheses the result obtained at P/P 0=0.95. [e] Pore diameter as obtained from QSDT method applied to N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K (in parentheses the values obtained applying the same model to Ar adsorption isotherms at 87 K). [f] Amount of CO2 adsorbed at 273 K at 800 torr.