Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;41(12):2073–2077. doi: 10.1002/humu.24120

Table 3.

MLPA results

No. of id PI_a PI_b PI_c cov SMN1a Cov SMN1b_e7 Cov SMN1c Cov SMN2a Cov SMN2b e7 Cov SMN2c Scale factor CN estimation MLPA genotype
1 0.26 0.19 0.24 13 8 11 23 23 22 0.741 1:2 1:1*
2 0.29 0.22 0.29 17 14 21 46 54 57 1.101 1:3 1:3
3 0.22 0.22 0.21 15 15 13 42 41 38 0.842 1:2 1:2
4 0.32 0.26 0.23 27 18 13 42 39 33 0.837 1:2 1:2
5 0.28 0.26 0.22 25 24 20 72 78 79 1.109 1:3 1:3
6 0.30 0.26 0.25 23 22 19 65 74 68 1.148 1:3 1:3
7 0.40 0.32 0.30 23 19 18 30 36 37 0.936 Inconclusive 1:2

Note: PI_x: scaled proportion of SMN1 reads in position x; cov xp: raw coverage of gene x at position p; scale factor: θ^i; CN estimation: absolute copy number estimation SMN1:SMN2; MLPA genotype: genotype inferred from MLPA analysis.

Abbreviation: MLPA, multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification.

*

MLPA analysis showed deletion of exons 7–8 on both genes but three copies of exons 1–6 (impossible to distinguish whether they come from SMN1 or SMN2).