TABLE 4.1.
Appraised literature | N° of Patients | N° of implants | 1‐year osseointegration success rate | 3‐year osseointegration success rate | 5‐year osseointegration success rate | Rehabilitation success rate |
Peñarrocha ‐Diago, 2000 5 | 4 | 15 | 100% | 100% (7) | NA | 100% |
Peñarrocha, Rambla; 2007 20 | 3 | 27 | 96.3% (27) | 100% (18) | 100% (20) | 100% |
Peñarrocha, 2007 21 | 6 | 38 | 97.4% | 100% (29) | 100% (20) | 100% |
Lee, 2007 22 | 1 | 8 | 100% | NA | NA |
75%, fixed successfully |
Larrazabal, 2009 8 | 1 | 2 | 100% | NA | NA | 100% |
Oliveira, 2010 23 | 1 | 2 | 100% | NA | NA | 100% |
Müller, 2010 24 | 1 | 10 | 100% | 100% | NA |
50%, fixed successfully |
Peñarrocha, 2011 25 | 6 | 36 | 100% (36) | 100% (16) | NA | 100% |
Peñarrocha, 2012 26 | 4 | 23 | 100% (23) | 100% (4) | NA | 100% |
Agustín‐Panadero, 2015 27 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | NA | NA | 100% |
Guzmán, 2016 28 | 1 | 11 | 100% (6) | 100% (6) | NA | 100% |
Agustín‐Panadero, 2017 29 | 1 | 4 | 100% | NA | NA | 100% |
Molina, 2017 30 | 1 | 7 | 100% | 100% | NA | 100% |
Agustín‐Panadero, 2019 31 | 4 | 31 | 100% | 100% | NA | 100% |
Key: NA, information not available; N, total number reported in the article. Number in brackets: number of implants reported with the specific follow‐up time.