TABLE 2.
Treatment patterns of matched cohorts during 6‐month follow‐up
DU vs. SEMA matched cohorts | DU vs. EBCise matched cohorts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
DU, N = 3852 | SEMA, N = 3852 | DU, N = 1879 | EBCise, N = 1879 | |
Initial dose fill, % | Only one dose available | |||
Low | 77.5 | 77.5 | 65.6 | |
High | 22.9 | 22.9 | 35.4 | |
Final dose fill, % | ||||
Low | 54.2 | 62.6** | 46.6 | |
High | 45.9 | 37.5** | 53.5 | |
Dosing pattern, % | ||||
Low dose only | 52.1 | 59.6** | 44.8 | |
High dose only | 21.7 | 20.2 | 33.5 | |
Low dose to high dose | 25.4 | 17.9** | 20.8 | |
All others | 1.2 | 2.7** | 1.9 | |
Number of index drug fills | ||||
Mean (SD) | 4.2 (2.1) | 3.8 (2.0)** | 4.3 (2.2) | 3.6 (2.1)** |
Patients with ≥2 index drug fills, % | 87.6 | 85.3* | 87.9 | 78.8** |
Patients with ≥4 index drug fills, % | 56.8 | 52.3** | 57.5 | 44.8** |
Abbreviations: DU, dulaglutide; EBCise, exenatide BCise; SEMA, semaglutide.
P <0.05 vs. dulaglutide.
P <0.0001 vs. dulaglutide.