Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 11;23(1):106–115. doi: 10.1111/dom.14195

TABLE 2.

Treatment patterns of matched cohorts during 6‐month follow‐up

DU vs. SEMA matched cohorts DU vs. EBCise matched cohorts
DU, N = 3852 SEMA, N = 3852 DU, N = 1879 EBCise, N = 1879
Initial dose fill, % Only one dose available
Low 77.5 77.5 65.6
High 22.9 22.9 35.4
Final dose fill, %
Low 54.2 62.6** 46.6
High 45.9 37.5** 53.5
Dosing pattern, %
Low dose only 52.1 59.6** 44.8
High dose only 21.7 20.2 33.5
Low dose to high dose 25.4 17.9** 20.8
All others 1.2 2.7** 1.9
Number of index drug fills
Mean (SD) 4.2 (2.1) 3.8 (2.0)** 4.3 (2.2) 3.6 (2.1)**
Patients with ≥2 index drug fills, % 87.6 85.3* 87.9 78.8**
Patients with ≥4 index drug fills, % 56.8 52.3** 57.5 44.8**

Abbreviations: DU, dulaglutide; EBCise, exenatide BCise; SEMA, semaglutide.

*

P <0.05 vs. dulaglutide.

**

P <0.0001 vs. dulaglutide.