Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;40(12):2906–2916. doi: 10.1111/liv.14696

TABLE 4.

Investigated correlations with IP in NAFLD patients

Author IP Test Type analysis Group Association between IP and clinical variable
Hendy et al Serum Zonulin Pearson correlation 56 NAFLD BMI (r = .378), ALT (r = .312), triglycerides (r = .296), HDL‐C (r = −.397), HOMA‐IR (r = .413), serum IL‐6 (r = .288).
Pacifico et al Serum Zonulin linear regression adjusted for age, gender and pubertal status

Total group

‐ 40 HC

‐ 40 NAFLD

‐ γ‐GT (β = 0.229), 2 h insulin (β = 0.340), WIBSI (β = −0.236)
Guercio Nuzio et al L/M (5 h) Pearson correlation

Total group

‐ 11 NAFLD

‐ 21 HC

Serum LPS (r = .48)
Nobili et al L/M (5h) Univariable linear regression 80 NAFLD Systolic blood pressure (β = 0.196), Plasma LPS (β = 0.296).

Abbreviations: L/M, lactulose mannitol ratio; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; HC, healthy control, BMI, body mass index; HDL‐C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT, alanine transaminase; HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model of assessment‐insulin resistance; γ‐GTP, gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase; WIBSI, whole body insulin sensitivity; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.