TABLE 1.
Batch size/input data | Transfer | Accuracy of each scheme | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT (n = 27) | PMA (33) | MT (25) | |||
Scheme 1 | 6, random (WT, PMA, MT) | ✗ | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.04 |
Scheme 2 | 6, random (WT, PMA, MT) | ✓ | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.04 |
Scheme 3 | 6, WT × 2, PMA × 2, MT × 2 | ✓ | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.67 ± 0.03 |
Scheme 4 | 8, WT × 2, PMA × 2, MT × 2, NT × 2 | ✓ | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.71 ± 0.04 |