Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;34(1):e4408. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4408

TABLE 1.

Results of the methods used for the identification of PGTs

Batch size/input data Transfer Accuracy of each scheme
WT (n = 27) PMA (33) MT (25)
Scheme 1 6, random (WT, PMA, MT) 0.73 ± 0.05 0.69 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.04
Scheme 2 6, random (WT, PMA, MT) 0.77 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.04
Scheme 3 6, WT × 2, PMA × 2, MT × 2 0.78 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.03 0.67 ± 0.03
Scheme 4 8, WT × 2, PMA × 2, MT × 2, NT × 2 0.81 ± 0.02 0.76 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.04