Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 9;12:574401. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.574401

Table 7.

The interaction coefficients for the comparison of the intercepts and the slopes of the models.

A comparison of the intersepts A comparison of the slopes
Estimate ± Std.Error p-value Estimate ± Std.Error p-value
SVMR_IES vs. CVMR_IES 75.74 ± 23.12 0.00113 1.1423 ± 0.4979 0.02224
AST_IES vs. IRT_IES 82.6360 ± 29.8992 0.005943 1.1794 ± 0.6440 0.067686
SVMR_IES vs. AST_IES 33.5681 ± 23.5458 0.154650 1.9064 ± 0.5071 0.000193
CVMR_IES vs. IRT_IES 40.4584 ± 29.5649 0.17184 1.9434 ± 0.6368 0.00241
A cross-gender comparison
CVMR_IES in females Full dataset −17.7913 ± 29.4919 0.5469 0.3271 ± 0.6461 0.61302
vs CVMR_IES in males Without outliers 24.97785 ± 16.0458 0.122 −0.5732 ± 0.3475 0.101
CVMR_error_rate in females Full dataset 0.602601 ± 0.692298 0.385 0.006794 ± 0.015167 0.655
vs CVMR_error_rate in males Without outliers 6.09494 ± 1.31926 0.00000866 −0.04594 ± 0.02785 0.1013
CVMR_mean in females Full dataset −14.48187 ± 22.57078 0.5218 0.04636 ± 0.49450 0.9254
vs CVMR_mean in males Without outliers −6.9771 ± 14.0149 0.6193 −0.1674 ± 0.2971 0.5739

The significant differences between intercepts are marked in bold.