Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;85:e607–e612. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2020.101058

Table 3.

Correlations between pulmonary regurgitation fraction, pulmonary regurgitation volume, peak right ventricular outflow tract gradient vs. right ventricular volumes and right ventricular ejection fraction

Parameter PRF PRV Peak RVOT gradient
All patients (n = 18) Significant PR (n = 13) All patients (n = 18) Significant PR (n = 13) All patients (n = 18) Significant PR (n = 13)
RVEDV r = 0.36
p = 0.15
r = –0.06
p =0.84
r = 0.37
p = 0.14
r = 0.003
p = 0.99
r = –0.14
p = 0.57
r = –0.13
p = 0.67
RVESV r = 0.20
p = 0.42
r = –0.06
p =0.85
r = 0.19
p = 0.45
r = –0.10
p = 0.75
r = –0.08
p = 0.74
r = 0.03
p = 0.93
RVEF r = –0.04
p = 0.87
r = –0.21
p =0.49
r = –0.03
p = 0.90
r = –0.02
p = 0.94
r = 0.19
p = 0.46
r = –0.02
p = 0.95

RVEDV – right ventricular end-diastolic volume, RVEF – right ventricular ejection fraction, RVESV – right ventricular end-systolic volume, RVM – right ventricular mass, RVSV – right ventricular stroke volume, PRF – pulmonary regurgitation fraction, PRV – pulmonary regurgitation volume, RVOT – right ventricular outflow tract