Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 23.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Pediatr Res. 2019 Jan 12;5(3):23. doi: 10.24105/apr.2019.5.23

Table 1.

Key factors that defined and differentiated the 4 study groups.

Features shared between sibling pairs Study Groups
1. Monozygotic twins 2. Dizygotic twins 3. Full-siblings 4. Half-siblings with the same birth mother
9 pairs 39 pairs 27 pairs 9 pairs
Birth mother identical identical identical identical
Birth father identical identical identical different
Genome shared ~100% ~50% ~50% ~25%
Prenatal alcohol exposure virtually identical virtually identical 100% same Rank 100% same Rank
Other prenatal risks virtually identical virtually identical 100% same Rank 88% same Rank
Siblings raised together 100% 100% 96% 100%
Other postnatal risks 100% same Rank 87% same Rank 83% same Rank 75% same Rank
Matched in age within one of 3 age-ranges (0–3; 4–8, 9+ years) 100% 100% *93% *89%
*

2 pairs of full-siblings and 1 pair of half-siblings had one sibling that was in a younger age category. In each of these 3 pairs, the younger sibling had the more severe FASD diagnostic outcome.