Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;36(1):307–318. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1861606

Table 5.

Docking energy scores (kcal/mol) derived from the MOE for compounds Vdf, VIac, and the reference ligand Sorafenib.

Comp. no. Score rmsd_refine E_conf E_place E_score1 E_score2 E_refine
Vd –7.3974 2.6436 89.8860 –55.3257 –13.3058 –7.3974 –30.4426
Ve –7.9154 1.4800 118.5701 –66.3756 –12.5551 –7.9154 –33.5940
Vf –6.9883 1.5306 101.3355 –81.8762 –11.3026 –6.9883 –27.0719
VIa –7.4371 1.3288 121.3822 –71.7816 –13.2958 –7.4371 –20.1583
VIb –6.7455 0.9160 103.8081 –80.8748 –12.5471 –6.7455 –16.9364
VIc –6.9328 1.2209 99.4951 –46.3408 –11.6422 –6.9328 –22.0011
Sorafenib –11.1354 1.0623 –57.2969 –94.4447 –12.8634 –11.1354 –69.0130

Score: lower scores are more favourable; rmsd_refine: the root mean square deviation of the pose from the docking pose compared to the co-crystal ligand position; E_conf: free binding energy of the conformer; E_place: free binding energy from the placement stage; E_score 1: free binding energy from the first rescoring stage; E_score 2: free binding energy from the second rescoring stage; E_refine: free binding energy from the refinement stage.