Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 10;8:588014. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.588014

TABLE 3.

Biohybrids/TI, Biomaterials-encapsulated RPE cells, in vitro studies.

Product Cell types Description Format Cell survival
Collagen-PLGA [1] Human RPE cells RPE cells formed a monolayer, showed polarity and native-like morphology could phagocytose film <2 w
Collagen [2] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) RPE cells formed a monolayer with appropriate phenotype and could phagocytose photoreceptors outer segments scaffold >1 w
Collagen [3] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) RPE cells formed a monolayer on both materials, collagen demonstrated upregulation of angiogenic molecule scaffold 0.5 w
Gelatin [4] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) RPE cells formed a monolayer with carbodiimide cross-linked gelatin membrane film 0.5 w
Elastin-like recombinamers (ELRs) [5] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) ELRs were not toxic, ARPE-19 proliferated well and maintained their phenotype film <1w
Microphotodiode array (SiO2, Si3N4, Pt, MPDA-Pt) [6] Porcine RPE cells RPE cells formed a monolayer with appropriate phenotype, biocompatible and non-toxic film <2 w
PLC [7] Fetal human RPE RPE cells on nanopatterned porous PLC showed better pigmentation, increased cell density, superior barrier function, up-regulation of RPE-specific genes, etc., than on porous PCL, non-porous PCL, or Costar porous polyester transwells scaffold >8 w
PDMS-PmL [8] Pluripotent cell differentiated RPE cells dRPE revealed good adhesion, proliferation, polarization, maturation and functionality cultured on PDMS-PmL scaffold >3 w
PEGDMA [9] Adult human RPE; porcine RPE Over 90% viability; confluent cells expressed F-actin and tight junction film 1 w
PET/PLGA-PGA NP [10] Adult human RPE stem cell (hRPESC) RPE cells formed a monolayer, the scaffold and NP showed no cytotoxicity scaffold 12 w
PLLA/PLGA [11] Fetal human RPE Good properties, cell attachment, and proliferation film 1 w
PLLA/PLGA [12] Human primary RPE cells/Porcine RPE cells RPE cells formed a monolayer, good properties, cell attachment and proliferation film 2 w
PLDLA/Collagen [13] Human embryonic stem cell derived RPE cells Supported cell growth, hESCs-RPE showed good adhesion, morphology and maintained phagocytic capacity film 8 w
PLGA/PEG/PLA [14] Human RPE cell line (D407) Micropatterned synthetic biodegradable polymer film that control RPE cell morphology, allows cell-cell interactions and higher cell adhesion film 1 w
Polyimide (PI) [15] Adult human RPE stem cell (hRPESC) Cells established hexagonal, cobblestone morphology with strong pigmentation, expressed RPE specific markers, and phagocytosed photoreceptor outer segments scaffold
Polytetrafluoroethylene-modified surface [16] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) ARPE-19 cells grew in a monolayer, showed phagocytic capacity. The film was not toxic. film 2 w
Silk Fibroin/PLC/Gelatin [17] Human primary RPE cells Higher cell growth rate and higher expression of characteristic RPE genes compared to PCL and PCL-silk scaffolds scaffold >12 w
Silk fibroin [17] [18] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) RPE cells formed a monolayer, the material showed biocompatibility and no toxicity film >16 w
Spider silk proteins [19] Human RPE cell line (ARPE-19) RPE cells formed a monolayer with appropriate phenotype and began to exhibit barrier function properties film 1 w

ESC, embryonic stem cells; dRPE, pluripotent differentiated RPE; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; hESCs-RPE, human embryonic stem cell-derived RPE cells; ARPE-19, human retinal pigment epithelial cell line-19; PCL, poly caprolactone; PET, poly(ethylene terephthalate); PLGA, poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid); PGA, poly(glycolic acid); NP, nanoparticles; PLDLA, copolymer 96/4 L-lactide/D-lactide; PLLA, poly(L-lactic acid); PLA, poly(DL-lactic acid); PEGDMA polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate; PDMS-PmL, plasma modified polydimethylsiloxane coated with laminin. [1] (Warnke et al., 2013); [2] (Lu et al., 2007); [3] (Imai et al., 2007); [4] (Lai, 2013): [5] (Redenti et al., 2009); [6] (Guenther et al., 1999; Wu et al., 2007); [7] (McHugh et al., 2014); [8] (Peng et al., 2016); [9] (Singh et al., 2001); [10] (McCormick et al., 2020); [11] (Giordano et al., 1997); [12] (Hadlock et al., 1999); [13] (Calejo et al., 2017); [14] (Lu et al., 2001); [15] (Subrizi et al., 2012); [16] (Krishna et al., 2011); [17] (Xiang et al., 2014); [18] (Chirila et al., 2015); [19] (Harris et al., 2019).