Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 10;8:567885. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.567885

Table 4.

Assessment of risk of bias according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool.

Study Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 % yes Riskb
Cohort studies
Warr et al. (71) × × × × × N/A N/A 55% (6/11) Moderate
Watson-Jones et al. (75) × × N/A N/A 82% (9/11) Low
Afolabi et al. (77) × ? × × N/A N/A 68% 7.5/11 Moderate
Govender et al. (74) × × ? × × N/A N/A 59% 6.5/11 Moderate
Slyker et al. (79) × × × N/A N/A 73% 8/11 Low
Donders et al. (84) × × × × N/A ? × × N/A N/A 25% 2.5/10 High
Cross sectional studies
Aduloju et al. (72) × ? N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 69% (5.5/8) Moderate
Shayo et al. (73) × × ? N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 69% (5.5/8) Moderate
Case-control studies
Aderoba et al. (80) × × N/A N/A N/A 80% (8/10) Low
Nakubulwa et al. (70) × × × N/A N/A N/A 50% (5/10) Moderate
Randomized controlled trial
Schoeman et al. (78) ? ? ? 84% 11/13 Low
Odendaal et al. (76) ? ? ? × ? 77% 10/13 Low

Studies included in this review were assessed for risk of bias according to JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Appraisal Tool, detailed in reference (66) and Supplementary Material 2. ✓, Indicates yes (1 point); ×, Indicates No (0 points); “?”, Indicates unclear (0.5 points). Riskb: The risk of bias was ranked as high when the study score reached up to 49%, moderate when the study score reached from 50 to 69%, and low when the study score reached more than 70%. N/A, not applicable.