Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;50(6):379–391. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2002140107

Table 6. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model for the analysis of potential risk factors associated with implant failure.

Factors Hazard ratio 95% CI P value
Potential risk factors associated with implant failures
Bone status (regenerated bone) 0.870 0.169–4.491 0.868
Age 1.061 0.981–1.146 0.138
Smoking 10.653 2.472–45.913 0.002a)
Risk factor of smoking associated with implant failure
Comparison with subgroup 1
Subgroup 2 10.872 2.039–57.962 0.005b)
Subgroup 3 0.906 0.091–8.990 0.933
Subgroup 4 9.094 0.827–100.054 0.071

CI: confidence interval, subgroup 1: nonsmokers in the native bone group, subgroup 2: smokers in the native bone group, subgroup 3: nonsmokers in the regenerated bone group, subgroup 4: smokers in the regenerated bone group.

a)In comparison with nonsmokers, smokers had a 10.7 times higher risk for implant failure, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05); b)In comparison with subgroup 1, subgroup 2 had a 10.9 times higher risk for implant failure, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).