Table 1.
A comparison of the performance of diverse sensor for trifluralin detection.
| Type of nano-materials | Techniques | Linear range | LOD/LLOQ | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB-ILs/GCE | CV | 80 nM-12 μM | 10 nM | [35] |
| Dropping mercury electrode | DPV | 2.85 nM-14 μM | 1.05 nM | [36] |
| Cu NW/CPE | FFTSW | 0.02–100 nM | 0.008 nM | [21] |
| SDS-GCE | SWV | 32.2–0.48 μM | 31 nM | [37] |
| rGO-PEI-AgNPs | SWV and DPV | 1mM-1 nM | 1 nM | [27] |
| SbF/GCE | DPV | 1 × 10−6–1×10−4M | 1.2 μM | [22] |
| MWCNTs/Fe3O4−Sio2-FLU/GCE | SWV | 1 nM-200 μM | 1 nM | [38] |
| Ag-citrate/GQDs nano-ink/leaf | CV | 0.008–1 mM | 8 μM | This work |
| SWV and DPV | 0.005–0.04 mM | 5 μM |