Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 24.
Published in final edited form as: Chronobiol Int. 2020 May 13;37(6):809–823. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2020.1756840

Table 3.

Open Field (mean ± SEM). a) Active time was increased in B6N/T = 21 mice compared to controls, but no other differences. b) Both strain (B6J > B6N) and photoperiod (T = 21 > T = 24) were present for Distance Traveled. c) Velocity was increased in mice under the 21-hour day compared to T = 24 mice. d) B6J exhibits increased Total Rotations compared to B6N. e) No significant differences for rearing or f) center zone Time. † indicates a T-cylce difference, σ indicates a baseline strain difference, and italics denotes significant pairwise comparison, at p < .05.

Genotype Diet T-cycle Active Time (min) (σ, †) Distance (cm) (σ, †) Velocity (cm/s) (†) Rears Total Rotations (σ) Center Zone Time (min)
B6J RC T = 24 8.88 ± 0.33 1277.37 ± 65.98 2.99 ± 0.070 103.50 ± 6.94 16.06 ± 0.87 1.49 ± 0.17
B6J HF T = 24 8.46 ± 0.13 1229.03 ± 56.79 2.79 ± 0.068 90.44 ± 6.83 18.57 ± 1.74 1.52 ± 0.18
B6J RC T = 21 9.00 ± 0.24 1180.05 ± 47.99 3.10 ± 0.15 98.13 ± 9.27 18.97 ± 1.05 1.84 ± 0.21
B6J HF T = 21 8.83 ± 0.21 1405.57 ± 59.85 3.07 ± 0.086 97.88 ± 9.51 16.22 ± 1.17 1.72 ± 0.18
B6N RC T = 24 7.68 ± 0.27 999.01 ± 61.78 2.75 ± 0.11 91.85 ± 12.65 13.62 ± 1.84 1.49 ± 0.17
B6N HF T = 24 8.26 ± 0.23 1092.26 ± 50.11 2.90 ± 0.12 95.85 ± 12.02 16.10 ± 1.80 1.30 ± 0.30
B6N RC T = 21 8.91 ± 0.35 1415.40 ± 94.25 2.92 ± 0.087 69.28 ±21.92 14.81 ± 1.93 1.28 ± 0.28
B6N HF T = 21 8.19 ± 0.19 1177.00 ± 75.73 2.95 ± 0.13 87.85 ±16.14 12.77 ± 1.02 1.64 ± 0.27