Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 19;12(4):156–163. doi: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_64_20

Table 8.

Summary of clinical studies with platelet-rich plasma or microneedling

YEAR NO. OF PATIENT AUTHOR SPLIT-SCALP INTERVENTION DONE CONTROL PRESENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS REMARKS
2006 20 Uebel et al13 YES PRP ONLY Yes Manual Counting by Magnifying glass 15.1% better graft survival in grafts treated with PRP vs control. PRP was compared for graft survival rate in receipients of Hair transplant surgery.
2013 100 Dhurat et al14 NO MN and Mx vs Mx only. MX only group present By PH and 7 point Sx scale. Dermaroller along with Minoxidil treated group was statistically superior to Minoxidil treated group in promoting hair growth. Study only took Photographic assessment which may be subjective,PRP was not done.
2014 20 Gkini et al15 No PRP only No HPT, DS, PH and aSX score They concluded that PRP injections may have a positive therapeutic effect on male and female pattern hair loss without remarkable major side effects. Beneficial effect of PRP were recorded but Microneedling was not done.
2014 11 Khatu et al16 No PRP only No CE,PHHPT and patient’s SX. PRP injection is a simple, cost effective and feasible treatment option for androgenic alopecia, with high overall patient satisfaction. Trichoscopic analysis was not done and only PRP was done.
2015 4 Dhurat andMathapati,17 No MN only N.A PH and patient SX scale The authors of this study considered microneedling to be an effective, inexpensive and novel tool in the treatment of AGA warranting further study. Dermoscopy was not done, only Microneedling was done. Patients were not on monotherapy.
2016 24 Alves and Grimalt18 Yes PRP on split scalp Yes PH and PTG Hair density, hair count increased significantly as compared to control side Microneedling was not done, only PRP was done
2017 50 Kachhawa et al19 YES PRP on split scalp Yes HPT, trichoscan software, patient SX. Authors concluded that PRP injections have therapeutic effect on male pattern hair loss with no major side effects and high patient satisfaction overall. PRP was injected on left side in all cases which could lead to bias.
2017 93 Jha et al20 NO MX, MX and PRP, MX, PRP and MN. Yes, MX only group HPT, DS and PH PRP with microneedling is better in comparison with PRP alone or minoxidil monotherapy in patients with AGA The study in all treatment groups had minoxidil which can have synergistic effects.
2017 50 Shah et al21 NO MX only and PRP+MN+MX Yes, MX only group Subjective assessment by patient and physician based evaluation on PH There was a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in bothpatients’ assessment and investigator’s assessment in Group B (PRP+MN+Mx)as compared to Group A (Mx only) at the end of 6 months No objective method was used to measure hair growth
2018 68 Kumar et al22 No MX alone and MN with MX Yes, MX only group DS(hair count only), PH, patients self assessment The study showed that the combination of MN and MX treatment was superior compared to topical MX alone with regard to increase in the hair count and patient SX, although the response achieved was not cosmetically significant PRP was not done
2019 40 Verma et al23 NO MX vs PRP Yes MX only group global photography, HPT, standardized hair growth questionnaire, patient satisfaction score On Global photography: Better outcome in PRP group as compared to minoxidil group HPT negative in 75% in PRP compared to 42.8% in minoxidil group Dermoscopic analysis was not done.