2006 |
20 |
Uebel et al13
|
YES |
PRP ONLY |
Yes |
Manual Counting by Magnifying glass |
15.1% better graft survival in grafts treated with PRP vs control. |
PRP was compared for graft survival rate in receipients of Hair transplant surgery. |
2013 |
100 |
Dhurat et al14
|
NO |
MN and Mx vs Mx only. |
MX only group present |
By PH and 7 point Sx scale. |
Dermaroller along with Minoxidil treated group was statistically superior to Minoxidil treated group in promoting hair growth. |
Study only took Photographic assessment which may be subjective,PRP was not done. |
2014 |
20 |
Gkini et al15
|
No |
PRP only |
No |
HPT, DS, PH and aSX score |
They concluded that PRP injections may have a positive therapeutic effect on male and female pattern hair loss without remarkable major side effects. |
Beneficial effect of PRP were recorded but Microneedling was not done. |
2014 |
11 |
Khatu et al16
|
No |
PRP only |
No |
CE,PHHPT and patient’s SX. |
PRP injection is a simple, cost effective and feasible treatment option for androgenic alopecia, with high overall patient satisfaction. |
Trichoscopic analysis was not done and only PRP was done. |
2015 |
4 |
Dhurat andMathapati,17
|
No |
MN only |
N.A |
PH and patient SX scale |
The authors of this study considered microneedling to be an effective, inexpensive and novel tool in the treatment of AGA warranting further study. |
Dermoscopy was not done, only Microneedling was done. Patients were not on monotherapy. |
2016 |
24 |
Alves and Grimalt18
|
Yes |
PRP on split scalp |
Yes |
PH and PTG |
Hair density, hair count increased significantly as compared to control side |
Microneedling was not done, only PRP was done |
2017 |
50 |
Kachhawa et al19
|
YES |
PRP on split scalp |
Yes |
HPT, trichoscan software, patient SX. |
Authors concluded that PRP injections have therapeutic effect on male pattern hair loss with no major side effects and high patient satisfaction overall. |
PRP was injected on left side in all cases which could lead to bias. |
2017 |
93 |
Jha et al20
|
NO |
MX, MX and PRP, MX, PRP and MN. |
Yes, MX only group |
HPT, DS and PH |
PRP with microneedling is better in comparison with PRP alone or minoxidil monotherapy in patients with AGA |
The study in all treatment groups had minoxidil which can have synergistic effects. |
2017 |
50 |
Shah et al21
|
NO |
MX only and PRP+MN+MX |
Yes, MX only group |
Subjective assessment by patient and physician based evaluation on PH |
There was a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in bothpatients’ assessment and investigator’s assessment in Group B (PRP+MN+Mx)as compared to Group A (Mx only) at the end of 6 months |
No objective method was used to measure hair growth |
2018 |
68 |
Kumar et al22
|
No |
MX alone and MN with MX |
Yes, MX only group |
DS(hair count only), PH, patients self assessment |
The study showed that the combination of MN and MX treatment was superior compared to topical MX alone with regard to increase in the hair count and patient SX, although the response achieved was not cosmetically significant |
PRP was not done |
2019 |
40 |
Verma et al23
|
NO |
MX vs PRP |
Yes MX only group |
global photography, HPT, standardized hair growth questionnaire, patient satisfaction score |
On Global photography: Better outcome in PRP group as compared to minoxidil group HPT negative in 75% in PRP compared to 42.8% in minoxidil group |
Dermoscopic analysis was not done. |