Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;114(8):426–450. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1824112

Table 3.

Summary of the prevalence of pathogens on mobile phones

Phone belongs to No. of phones contaminated with bacteria (%) No. of phones contaminated with MRSA (%) Facility Country of study Reference
Hospital doctors and staff (132), college faculty and staff (54), medical students (100) and control group (100) 316/386 (81.8%) 16 (4%) Hospital India [130]
Nurses, 32 (17.5%) from laboratory workers, and 57 (31.1%) from health care staff 179/183 (97.8%) 17 (9.5%) Hospital Turkey [129]
HCWs1 157/213 (73.7 %) 1.4% Intensive care units (ICUs), pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and neonatal care units (NCUs) Kuwait [134]
Health care personnel 65/120 (54.2%) 11(16.4%) General India [135]
Hands and mobile phones of HCWs   16/27 (59%) General India [136]
Mobile phones of HCWs 13/101 (13%) 4/101 (4%) General Korea [137]
Mobile phones with HCWs 144/200 (72%) 26/200 (13%) General India [138]
Pagers of HCWs 12/100 (12%) 3 (3%) General USA [139]
Students 107/309 (34.6%) ND2 University Japan [140]
Patients, patients’ companions, visitors,
HCW
121/133 (90%)
58/67 (85.6%)
ND Hospital Turkey [141]
Patients & HCW 40/40 (100%) 21 (53%) Hospital Egypt [142]
Veterinary students, technicians, residents/interns and clinical faculty 3/123 (1%) 1/123 (0.8%) Veterinary teaching hospitals Canada [143]

1HCW; health-care workers

2ND: not determined