Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;114(8):426–450. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1824112

Table 4.

Summary of the published studies on the presence of MRSA inside transportation vehicles and stations

Type of swab- sample collected Type of transportation vehicle/station (number) No. (%) of samples/vehicles positive for MRSA out of the total collected Country of study References, Time of sample collection
Handrails (1400 swabs) Trolleybuses, trams and buses (n = 55) 0% of samples Belgrade, Serbia [154] (NI) *
Handrails Buses (n = 85) 26% of buses Oporto, Portugal [155] (05–2009/02-2010)
Straps and handrails Subway trains (n = 349) 2.3% of trains Tokyo and Niigata, Japan [156] (2008–2010)
Handrails, ticket machines and hand-touched surfaces buses and stations 0% Lyon, France [157] (NI)
Handrails, seat rails, handgrips, stop buttons and tickets machine Buses (n = 199) 36.2% of buses Lisbon, Portugal [158] (05–2011/05-2012)
Pooled samples from handrails, seats, seat rails, driver’s area Buses (n = 40) 63 % of buses Ohio, USA [159] (07–2010/10-2010)
handrails and stop buttons Buses (n = 112) 16.1% of buses Porto, Portugal [160] (10–2010/05-2011)
Hand rails, seats, stanchions, Ticket Vending Machines (TVMs) and escalators. stations and carriages 2.5% of stations Guangzhou, China [161] (11–2013)
Toilet door handles Airport (n = 136) 0.7% of airports Worldwide [162] (12–2012/11-2015)
Grab rail, armrest and vinyl seat Buses (n = 15) 12 isolates from 45 samples Chittagong City, Bangladesh [163] (NI)
380 surface samples railway stations and coach stations 1.58% of the 149 Staphylococcus species China [164] (12–2013-01-2014)
Handle and seat surfaces Public transportation vehicles (n = 28) 31.4 % of vehicles Kathmandu valley, Nepal [153] (06–2017-08-2017)

* NI; not identified