Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 11;11:600026. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.600026

Table 1.

Sleep macro and microstructure features in the three groups.

Features N Group Values (Mean +/– SD) P-value post-hoc Effect size
Age (year) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
28 +/– 7
28 +/– 5
31 +/– 10
p = 0.187 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.950
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.327
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.227
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.193
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.000
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.153
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.171
F(2, 96) = 1.7063
Partial eta-square = 0.034
Sex (F/M) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
12/12
12/23
20/20
p = 0.323 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.228
HC vs. SHE: p = 1.000
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.168
Phi, Cramer's V = 0.151
Cohen's w = 0.151
TST (min) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
466 +/ 24
389.92 +/– 56.97
438 +/– 74
p < 0.001 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.000
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.166
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.0020
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.539
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.518
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.196
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.374
F(2, 96) = 12.728
Partial eta-square = 0.210
SE (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
93 +/– 5
87.59 +/– 11.59
85 +/– 17
p = 0.065 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.269
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.051
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.667
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.255
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.168
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.255
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.092
F(2, 96) = 2.817
Partial eta-square = 0.055
N1 + N2 (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
55 +/– 14
55.03 +/– 8.6
53 +/– 12
p = 0.693 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.939
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.779
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.726
Overall effect size Cohen's f = 0.084
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.001
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.066
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.075
F(2, 96) = 0.368
Partial eta-square = 0.007
N3 (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
20 +/– 13
26.44 +/– 8.55
28 +/– 10
p = 0.011 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.054
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.010
DoA vs. SHE: p= 0.792
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.299
HC vs. DoA: f=0.229
HC vs. SHE: f=0.292
DoA vs. SHE: f=0.063
F(2, 96) = 4.705
Partial eta-square = 0.089
REM (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
25 +/– 5
17.02 +/– 5.2
19 +/– 6
p < 0.001 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.000
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.000
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.269
Overall effect size Cohen's f = 0.570
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.559
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.431
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.159
F(2, 96) = 15.648
Partial eta-square = 0.246
CAP rate (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
32 +/– 5
50.86 +/– 10.24
72 +/– 11
p < 0.001 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.000
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.000
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.000
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 1.733
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.782
HC vs. SHE: f = 1.703
DoA vs. SHE: f = 1.004
F(2, 96) = 134.7
Partial eta-square = 0.737
CAP A1 (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
63 +/– 12
59.87 +/– 14.90
56 +/– 17
p = 0.193 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.722
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.180
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.516
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.189
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.080
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.184
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.115
F(2, 96) = 1.6702
Partial eta-square = 0.034
CAP A2 (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
21 +/– 8
17.9 +/– 10.35
22 +/– 9
p = 0.154 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.421
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.909
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.142
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.199
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.128
HC vs SHE: f = 0.043
DoA vs SHE: f = 0.194
F(2, 96) = 1.9086
Partial eta-square = 0.038
CAP A3 (%) 24
35
40
HC
DoA
SHE
16 +/– 6
22.25 +/. 13.25
22 +/– 10
p = 0.052 HC vs. DoA: p = 0.071
HC vs. SHE: p = 0.076
DoA vs. SHE: p = 0.994
Overall effect size
Cohen's f = 0.257
HC vs. DoA: f = 0.233
HC vs. SHE: f = 0.229
DoA vs. SHE: f = 0.011
F(2, 96) = 3.0576
Partial eta-square = 0.060

DoA, disorder of arousal; SHE, sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy; HC, healthy controls; TST, total sleep time; SE, sleep efficiency. Significant results are marked in bold.

Continuous variables: p-value from one-way Anova with Tukey HSD post-hoc test.

Categorical data: p-value from Pearson's Chi-square test with likelihood-ratio test.

Effect size: according to Jacob Cohen f values of 0.10, 0.25, and 0.40 represent small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively; partial eta squared is a measure of the proportion of the total variance in a dependent variable that is associated with the membership to different groups. Values of eta-squared of 0.01, 0.06, and 0.14 represent small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively.