Table 7.

Multiple treatment effects estimated for AML dataset using nine methods.

	ATE	Number of individuals with treatment effect
Method	HDAC vs. other	HDAC	No difference	Other
MGANITE	0.1001	59	115	38
LR	0.1149	58	122	32
LogR	0.0896	54	123	35
SVM	0.1463	59	140	13
KNN (5)	0.1887	62	128	22
KNN (10)	0.3538	80	127	5
BLR	0.0860	45	138	29
RF (C)	0.2264	73	114	25
RF (R)	0.2127	58	145	9
Method	HDAC+IDA vs. other	HDAC+IDA	No difference	Other
MGANITE	0.2311	79	103	30
LR	0.0965	59	115	38
LogR	0.2123	56	115	41
SVM	0.2453	52	138	22
KNN (5)	0.1012	62	133	17
KNN (10)	0.1604	63	138	11
BLR	0.1307	49	137	26
RF (C)	0.0708	70	106	36
RF (R)	0.0835	43	155	14
Method	HDAC+IDA vs. HDAC	HDAC+IDA	No difference	HDAC
MGANITE	0.1310	52	136	24
LR	−0.0184	36	130	46
LogR	−0.0189	45	118	49
SVM	−0.0628	9	181	22
KNN (5)	0.0236	34	149	29
KNN (10)	−0.1085	11	167	34
BLR	0.0152	40	139	33
RF (C)	−0.0660	31	136	45
RF (R)	−0.0821	8	184	20