TABLE 4.

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting depressive symptoms on at Wave 2 in Step 3 in Study 3 (n = 228, Sample 9).

			95% CI
Predictor	ΔR2	B	LL	UL	t	p
Step 1
Depression at Wave 1		0.44	0.33	0.56	7.51	<0.001
Step 2	0.124	ΔF(7,219) = 7.32, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.14
Substance use		1.32	0.45	2.19	2.98	0.003
Emotional support		0.62	−0.26	1.49	1.39	0.167
Instrumental support		0.04	−0.73	0.81	0.11	0.917
Behavioral disengagement		0.70	−0.06	1.47	1.81	0.072
Venting		0.01	−0.65	0.67	0.02	0.984
Religion		0.04	−0.71	0.78	0.09	0.927
Self-blame		1.30	0.71	1.88	4.38	<0.001
Step 3	0.031	ΔF(2,217) = 6.84, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.03
Abandonment		−0.37	−0.72	−0.03	2.14	0.033
Re-coping		−0.48	−0.86	−0.11	2.55	0.011
Total R2	0.502	F(10,217) = 21.84, p < 0.001, f2 = 1.01
Step 1
Depression at Wave 1		0.57	0.45	0.68	9.71	<0.001
Step 2	0.028	ΔF(1,225) = 10.00, p = 0.002, f2 = 0.03
Coping repertoire		1.04	0.47	1.62	3.58	<0.001
Step 3	0.042	ΔF(2,223) = 7.97, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.04
Abandonment		−0.38	−0.74	−0.02	2.05	0.041
Re-coping		−0.58	−0.96	−0.20	3.00	0.003
Total R2	0.416	F(4,223) = 39.68, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.71
Step 1
Depression at Wave 1		0.53	0.41	0.65	8.63	< 0.001
Step 2	0.057	ΔF(5,222) = 5.23, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.06
Controllability		−0.46	−1.02	0.10	1.63	0.106
Problem-focused coping		0.31	−0.16	0.79	1.29	0.197
Emotion-focused coping		0.22	−0.01	0.45	1.88	0.062
Avoidance coping		0.23	0.21	1.09	2.88	0.004
Step 3	0.036	ΔF(2,220) = 7.09, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.04
Abandonment		−0.41	−0.77	−0.04	2.21	0.028
Re-coping		−0.54	−0.95	−0.13	2.62	0.009
Total R2	0.439	F(7,220) = 24.61, p < 0.001, f2 = 0.78

CI is confidence interval; LL and UL are lower and upper limits, respectively.