Table 3.
Effect of encapsulated L-Lys-HCl and DL-Met supplementation on the laying performance of hens1,2
Item | Control | 80CLM | 60CLM | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final BW, kg | 2.07 ± 0.02 | 2.12 ± 0.07 | 2.08 ± 0.08 | 0.858 |
Feed intake, g/d | 128.2 ± 2.2 | 132.2 ± 2.9 | 126.3 ± 3.1 | 0.327 |
Laying rate, % | 87.1 ± 1.1 | 87.4 ± 0.8 | 85.8 ± 1.2 | 0.172 |
Egg mass, g/hen/d | 56.6 ± 0.8 | 57.2 ± 0.6 | 56.2 ± 0.8 | 0.293 |
Egg weight, g | 65.0 ± 0.25 | 65.5 ± 0.16 | 65.5 ± 0.20 | 0.168 |
Feed efficiency, g/g | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.761 |
1Basal diet supplemented with encapsulated L-lys HCL and DL-met at 60% (60 CLM) or 80% (80CLM) of the control levels.
2Data were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5).