Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):3808. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123808

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes and adverse events of the included studies for small common bile dust stones.

Author Comparison Study
Design
No. of
Patients
Diameter of Stones (mm) Mean ± SD or Mean (Range) Balloon
Size, mm
Procedure
Time, min
ML Use
% (No.)
Successful Stone Removal in the 1st Session
% (No.)
Overall Uccessful Stone Removal
% (No.)
Overall AEs
% (No.)
Bleeding
% (No.)
Perforation
% (No.)
PEP
% (No.)
Cholangitis
% (No.)
EST vs. EPBD
Bergman EST RCT 101 9
(4–27)
NA 12.9% (13) 91.1% (92) 91.1% (92) 11.9% (12) 4% (4) 1% (1) 6.9% (7) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 101 10
(3–36)
8 NA 30.7% (31) 80.2% (81) 89.1% (90) 8.9% (9) 0% (0) 2% (2) 6.9% (7) 0% (0)
Ochi EST RCT 55 8.8 ± 4.2 NA 3.7% (2) 94.4% (51) 98.1% (54) 5.6% (3) 0% (0) 1.8% (1) 3.6% (2) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 55 8.1 ± 3.4 8 NA 13.7% (7) 78.4% (40) 92.7% (51) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Arnold EST RCT 30 10 ± 4.7 17 ± 12 NA 100% (30) 100% (30) 16.7% (5) 6.7% (2) 0% (0) 10% (3) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 30 7 ± 3.5 8 29 ± 15 NA 76.7% (23) 100% (30) 30% (9) 0% (0) 0% (0) 20% (6) 10% (3)
Yasuda EST RCT 35 12.3
(5–24)
NA 25.7% (9) 100% (35) 100% (35) 8.6% (3) 2.9% (1) 0% (0) 5.7% (2) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 35 12.4
(4–24)
8 NA 48.6% (17) 100% (35) 100% (35) 5.7% (2) 0% (0) 0% (0) 5.7% (2) 0% (0)
Natsui EST RCT 70 9.7
(3–17)
NA 38.6% (27) 70% (49) 98.6% (69) 11.4% (8) 2.9% (2) 0% (0) 4.3% (3) 4.3% (3)
EPBD RCT 70 9.2
(3–22)
8 NA 41.4% (29) 58.6% (41) 92.9% (65) 8.6% (6) 0% (0) 0% (0) 5.7% (4) 2.9% (2)
Fujita EST RCT 144 7.3 ± 3.4 NA 11.8% (17) 78.5% (113) 100% (144) 12.5% (18) 1.4% (2) 0% (0) 2.8% (4) 8.3% (12)
EPBD RCT 138 7 ± 3.1 4-8 NA 14.5% (20) 76.1% (105) 99.3% (137) 14.5% (20) 0% (0) 0% (0) 10.9% (15) 3.6% (5)
Vlavianos EST RCT 99 NA NA NA 63.6% (63) 86.9% (86) 2% (2) 0% (0) 0% (0) 1% (1) 1% (1)
EPBD RCT 103 NA 10 NA NA 63.1% (65) 87.4% (90) 6.8% (7) 0% (0) 0% (0) 4.9% (5) 1.9% (2)
Disario EST RCT 120 5
(0.5–14)
42 ± 19 NA 92.5% (111) NA 3.3% (4) 0% (0) 0.8% (1) 0.8% (1) 1.7% (2)
EPBD RCT 117 6
(0.5–10)
≤8 47 ± 25 NA 88% (103) NA 17.9% (21) 0% (0) 0% (0) 15.4% (18) 2.6% (3)
Takezawa EST RCT 45 11
(3–27)
37.2 ± 12.4 31.1% (14) NA 100% (45) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 46 10
(1–35)
8 37.4 ± 13 34.8% (16) NA 100% (46) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Watanabe EST RCT 90 7.7 ± 2.9 NA 64.4% (58) 57.8% (52) 95.6% (86) 3.3% (3) 1.1% (1) 0% (0) 2.2% (2) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 90 8.1 ± 3.2 8 NA 84.4% (76) 72.2% (65) 86.7% (78) 13.3% (12) 0% (0) 0% (0) 10% (9) 3.3% (3)
Seo EST RCT 70 7.6 ± 3.1 NA 8.6% (6) 91.4% (64) 100% (70) 11.4% (8) 2.9% (2) 1.4% (1) 7.1% (5) 0% (0)
EPBD RCT 62 7.2 ± 2.1 6-10 NA 8.1% (5) 91.9% (57) 98.4% (61) 8.1% (5) 0% (0) 0% (0) 8.1% (5) 0% (0)
EST vs. ESBD
Ishii EST NRCT 114 5.1 ± 2.9 31.6 ± 16.8 16.7% (19) 64.9% (74) 100% (114) 15.8% (18) 9.6% (11) 1.8% (2) 2.6% (3) 1.8% (2)
ESBD NRCT 321 5.6 ± 3 8-10 25.8 ± 18.8 7.8% (25) 87.2% (280) 100% (321) 4.4% (14) 1.2% (4) 0.3% (1) 1.9% (6) 0.9% (3)