Table 4.

Effect of increasing levels of Met sources on carcass yield and breast meat yield expressed as percentage of body weight at 35 days of age.

Treatment	Met Source	Added Product	Carcass Yield		Breast Meat Yield
		g/kg	% of BW 1	Rel. 2	% of BW 1	Rel. 2
1	Basal	0.00	58.1 a	100	12.3 a	100
2	DLM	0.40	62.1 c	107	15.4 cd	125
3	DLM	0.80	63.8 def	110	17.4 efg	141
4	DLM	1.20	66.1 i	114	18.5 hi	150
5	DLM	2.10	65.4 ghi	113	20.4 k	165
6	DLM	3.00	65.8 hi	113	20.0 k	162
7	HMTBA	0.40	61.6 c	106	14.7 bc	119
8	HMTBA	0.80	62.9 cde	108	16.4 de	133
9	HMTBA	1.20	64.2 efgh	111	17.3 ef	140
10	HMTBA	2.10	64.1 efg	110	18.4 ghi	150
11	HMTBA	3.00	65.0 fghi	111	19.7 jk	160
12	DLM65	0.40	60.0 b	103	14.0 b	114
13	DLM65	0.80	62.4 cd	107	15.7 cd	128
14	DLM65	1.20	64.7 fghi	111	17.6 fgh	143
15	DLM65	2.10	65.4 fghi	112	18.9 ij	154
16	DLM65	3.00	65.5 ghi	113	20.0 k	163
p-value			<0.001		<0.001

^{1 a–k} Values without a common superscript within a column differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05); ² Rel: Relative response of each dietary treatment compared to the basal diet, which was set as 100%.