Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 28;12(12):3664. doi: 10.3390/nu12123664

Table 2.

Characteristics and major findings of the studies analyzing the effect of nutrition education interventions on nutrition knowledge in team sport athletes.

Authors Year Sample
Size (n)
Age
(M ± SD Years)
Country Sport Competition Level Questionnaire Intervention (Modality, Frequency, and Duration) Major Findings
Abood et al. [25] 2004 NEI
(15 females)
CG
(15 females)
NEI
(19.6 ± 1.0)
CG (19.4 ± 1.2)
United States NEI
Soccer
CG
Swimming
College division I Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index Nutrition education intervention
NEI
(online, 8 × 1-h sessions, 8 weeks)
CG
(no treatment)
NEI athletes experienced a significant increase in nutrition knowledge and self-efficacy compared to CG.
Daniel et al. [40] 2016 10 females 17.2 ± 0.9 Brazil Volleyball Junior KAP questionnaire Interdisciplinary Food, Nutrition and Health Education Program
(F2F, 8 sessions, 8 months)
NE athletes improved their nutrition knowledge from 57.0 ± 9.9% at baseline to 63.0 ± 11.8% following the intervention.
Elias et al. [26] 2018 NEI
(52 males)
CG
(53 males)
NEI
(18.7 ± 0.9)
CG (23.3 ± 3.8)
Malaysia NEI
Field hockey and soccer.
CG
Cricket and rugby union
National Jürgensen questionnaire Sport education intervention activities
NEI
(F2F and online, 7 × 1.5-h sessions, 9 weeks)
CG
(no treatment)
NEI athletes showed significant increases (−6.21 ± 2.95 points) in nutrition knowledge after the intervention.
Significant decrease (−2.15 ± 1.45 points) in nutrition knowledge after the intervention in the CG.
Patton-Lopez et al. [23] 2018 NEI
(153 males and females)
CG
(64 males and females)
NEI
(14.9 ± 0.9)
CG (14.9 ± 0.9)
United States Soccer High school SNK questionnaire WAVE education program
NEI
(F2F, 7 sport nutrition lessons and 3 team building workshops, 1–1.5 h, 2 years)
CG
(no treatment)
NEI athletes significantly increased their nutrition knowledge scores from 5.16 ± 1.80 points at baseline to 6.09 ± 1.59 points after the 1-year intervention, while there were no changes in the CG.
Reading et al. [41] 1999 33 males 14.3 ± 3.6 Canada Ice hockey Youth Modified version of SNAC questionnaire Sport Nutrition for the Athletes of Canada (SNAC)
(F2F, online and lectures, 4 × 1-h sessions, 2 weeks)
No changes in nutrition knowledge following the intervention.
Rossi et al. [32] 2017 15 females 19.3 ± 1.0 United States Baseball College division 1 Reilly and Maughan sports nutrition questionnaire Nutrition education intervention
(F2F, 3 times per week, 12 weeks)
NEI athletes significantly improved their nutrition knowledge from 54.7 ± 14.3% at baseline to 70.0 ± 9.4% following the intervention.
Simpson et al. [42] 2017 17 males 19.0 ± 0.7 New Zealand Hockey International and national Zin et al. questionnaire of nutritional knowledge Nutrition education intervention
(online, once a week, 6 weeks)
NEI athletes significantly improved their nutrition knowledge from 56.7 ± 11.4% at baseline to 61.1 ± 11.5% following the intervention.
Valliant et al. [22] 2012 NEI
11 females
CG
11 females
NEI
19.8 ± 1.0
CG
19.5 ± 1.0
United States Volleyball College division 1 Reilly and Maughan sports nutrition questionnaire Nutrition education intervention
NEI
(F2F, 4 individual sessions, 4 months)
CG
(no treatment)
NEI athletes significantly increased their nutrition knowledge scores from 24.7 ± 5.9 points at baseline to 31.5 ± 6.1 points following intervention.
Zeng et al. [24] 2020 NEI
15 males
CG
15 males
NEI
16.7 ± 1.8
CG
16.8 ± 1.7
China Soccer Youth top KAP questionnaire Nutrition education intervention
NEI
(F2F and comic book, once a week during 30 min, 4 weeks)
CG
(comic book)
NEI improved general and sports nutrition knowledges following the intervention.

n: number; M: mean; SD: standard deviation; NEI: sport nutrition education intervention; CG: control group; F2F: face to face; KAP: nutrition knowledge, attitude and practice; SNK: sport nutrition knowledge.