Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 27;12(12):3648. doi: 10.3390/nu12123648

Table 2.

Interventions and outcomes of the included randomized controlled trials investigating low FODMAP diet in patients with IBD and FGS.

First Author: Bodini [26] Cox [24,25] Halmos [23] Pedersen [27,28,29]
Relief assessment: NR GSQ 100 mm VAS NR
Improvement definition: NR Achieving a 50-point reduction in IBS-SSS NR Achieving a 50-point reduction in IBS-SSS
Intervention: LFD
No ONS was allowed
LFD LFD ≤ 0.5 g per sitting [37] (three main meals and three snacks daily were delivered to patients) + small quantities of psyllium and resistant starch (daily average of 3 g psyllium and 5 g Hi-Maize 220 (National Starch and Chemical Company, Bridgewater, NJ, USA), to ensure similar fiber content LFD
Comparator: Standard diet Sham exclusion diet of similar intensity, burden, and nutrient intake to the LFD typical Australian diet Normal diet
Assessment of dietary FODMAP intake: Detailed meals with calculated FODMAP content (NOD) Via FODMAP database (Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) FODMAP content for all provided food underwent FODMAP analysis via high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic assays NR
Intervention duration: 6 weeks 4 weeks 21 days (each intervention) 6 weeks
Wash-out duration: N/A N/A >21 days (until the symptoms had returned to the same level as during their habitual diet) N/A
Stool: Sample 7-day diary and fresh stool sample at baseline 5-day samples Sample
fCAL assay: Quantum Blue fCAL (Buhlmann Lab) ELISA ELISA using a commercial kit (Buhlmann EK-Cal, Schönenbuch, Switzerland) Home-administered collecting kit and ELISA
Compliance assessment: Dietitian (weekly phone calls and food diaries) With a question at the end of the trial: “During the 4-week trial I have followed the diet…”: never/rarely (<25% of the time), sometimes (25–50% of the time), frequently (51–75% of the time) or always (76–100% of the time) and with 7-day food diaries Dietitian FFQ [45] with the most commonly consumed high-FODMAP foods adapted to the Danish population
Dropouts (n): - n = 6 (2 withdrew consent, 1 became pregnant, 1 initiated steroids, and 1 antibiotics)
n = 3 for low compliance
n = 1 for low LFD compliance n = 11 (7 for difficulty in LFD compliance and 4 for lack of compliance with registering IBS symptoms)
Non-compliant (n): NR n = 3 n = 1 from the LFD group n = 7 from the LFD group
Adverse events (n): NR n = 2 IBD relapse (one in each group)
n = 1 started antibiotics unrelated to IBD
n = 1 abdominal pain (controls)
n = 2 flu-like symptoms and sinusitis (one in each group)
NR
Primary outcomes: Δ in PMS, HBi,
IBD-Q
Δ in IBS-SSS Δ in fecal microbiota including total, butyrate-producing (C. leptum, F. prausnitzii, Roseburia spp.), traditionally prebiotic (Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria spp.), and mucus-degrading bacteria (A. muciniphila, R. gnavus, R. torques) Δ in HBi, SCCAI, patients reporting improvement
Secondary outcomes: Δ in CRP levels, fCAL, anthropometry Δ in GSRS, fecal SCFA (GLC), fecal pH (InLab, Mettler Toledo probe), CRP, BSFS, IBD-Q, HBi, PMS, IBD Control Q, fecal microbiome composition and function fecal pH, total and specific fecal SCFA concentration, severity of GI symptoms (100 mm VAS), fecal frequency and weight, FWC, whole-gut transit time, comparison of data during interventional diets to habitual diet Δ in IBS-SSS, QoL (HR-QoL, IBS-QoL), CRP, fCAL, SIBDQ, SF36, treatment satisfaction (VAS)
Microbiome composition: - Via quantitative metagenomic pipeline PCR on DNA fecal samples -
T-cell phenotype: - CD3, CD45RA+, CD45RA-, CD4, CD8, Vδ2 unconventional T-cells, integrin α4β7 - -
Timepoints: Baseline and end (6 weeks) Baseline and end of trial (4 weeks) Start and end of each intervention Baseline and 6 weeks
Analyses: ITT n = 55 ITT n = 52
PP n = 43
PP n = 8 ITT intervention n = 37
ITT controls n = 41
Jadad score [22]: 3 3 3 2

A. muciniphila, Akkermansia muciniphila; B. adolescentis, Bifidobacterium adolescentis; B. longum, Bifidobacterium longum; BSFS, Bristol Stool Form Scale [41]; CRP, C-reactive protein; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; fCAL, fecal calprotectin; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; F. prausnitzii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; FGS, Functional gastrointestinal symptoms; FODMAP, Fermentable Oligo-, Di-, Monosaccharides, and Polyols; FWC, fecal water content; GI, gastrointestinal; GLC, gas–liquid chromatography; GSRS, Gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale [46]; GSQ, Global Symptom Question [47,48]; HBi, Harvey Bradshaw Index for CD [33]; HR-QoL, IBS Health-related Quality of Life [43]; IBD, inflammatory bowel diseases; IBD-Q, inflammatory bowel disease—Quality of Life [34,35]; IBD-Control-Q, IBD Control Questionnaire [38]; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-QoL, IBS Quality of Life [44]; IBS-SSS, IBS Severity Scoring System [49]; ITT, intention to treat; LFD, Low FODMAP diet; N/A, not applicable; NOD, not other defined; NR, not reported; ONS, oral nutrient supplements; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PMS, Partial Mayo Score for UC [36]; PP, per protocol; R. gnavus, Ruminococcus gnavus; R. torques, Ruminococcus torques; SCCAI, Simple clinical colitis activity index [39]; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids; SIBDQ, Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; SF36, Short-form 36 [42]; VAS, Visual analogue scale.