Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;12(12):3688. doi: 10.3390/nu12123688

Table 1.

Included studies characteristics.

Author Publication
Date
Design Journal Sample Size Subjects’Age at the Diagnosis of Malocclusion Orthodontic Diagnosis Malocclusion Types Considered Assessment Method Statistical Analysis
Campos MPMS et al. [14] 2018 Cross-sectional study Braz Oral Res. 290 6 years Clinical examination.
Anterior open bite was diagnosed based on the criteria given by Foster and Hamilton [43].
Dental and skeletal malocclusions were evaluated. The Z-score development index (ratio between height and age) was employed to express nutritional status at birth and at 6 years of age (WHO reference standard). Multivariate logistic regression; odds ratio (OR), chi-square test.
Costa CTD. et al. [36] Cross-sectional study Braz Oral Res. 489 2–5 years WHO index Anterior crossbite, open bite, median line deviation, crowding or spacing Validated questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, odds ratio (OR)
Germa et al. [44] 2016 Cohort study Angle Orthod. 422 3 years Clinical examination.
Direct inspection for transverse and vertical relation.
Anterior open bite, posterior crossbite. Self-administered questionnaires Multiple logistic regressions.
Lopes-Freire GM et al. [15] 2015 Cross-sectional observational survey Prog Orthod. 275 3–6 years Clinical examination. Direct inspection for transverse and vertical relation. Angle class/primary teeth canine relationship for interarch sagittal malocclusion. Posterior crossbite.
anterior open bite, and overbite, sagittal occlusal relationship (angle class, primary canine relationship, overjet)
Validated questionnaire. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, odds ratio (OR)
Peres KG. et al. [39] 2015 Cohort study Pediatrics 1303 5 years Clinical examination in a single home visit.
WHO classification
Openbite; crossbite; overjet. Questionnaire recorded at 3, 12, and 24 months. Poisson regression analyses
Chen X et al. [38] 2015 Cross- sectional study BMC Pediatr. 734 3–6 years Does not specify Deep bite, open bite, anterior/posterior crossbite, sagittal relationship between primary canines and between second primary molars, presence or absence of crowding or spacing. Questionnaire repeated every six months for the first three years of life and the non-nutritive sucking habits. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regressions
Sum FH et al. [18] 2015 Cross-sectional study BMC Oral Health 851 2–5 years Own criteria
(Kappa 0.70–1.00)
Incisal relationship; sagittal relationship between primary canines and between second primary molars, overjet; anterior/posterior crossbite; anterior openbite; overbite; intercanine width; intermolar width; posterior crossbite Self-administered questionnaires on feeding habits and history of non-nutritive sucking habits Multinomial logistic regression models; Multi-way ANOVA.
Agarwal SS et al. [45] 2014 Cross-sectional retrospective study Prog Orthod. 415 4–6 years Self-defined criteria statistically validated
(kappa = 0.758)
Anterior open bite, posterior crossbite
upper and lower inter-molar distance (IMD) and inter-canine distance (ICD)
One-time administered validated questionnaire Chi-square test and Odds ratio to assess the strength of correlations in object. Multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of posterior crossbite and upper and lower IMD and ICD
Limeira et al. [37] 2014 Cross-sectional retrospective study J Dent Child. 714 6 to 9 years old The clinical examination was performed with the subject seated in a chair under natural light, using disposable tongue blades and gloves. The occlusal relationships were evaluated in centric occlusion. Posterior cross-bite A validated questionnaire was completed by guardians concerning the length of time they were exclusively breast-fed and the breast-feeding duration. Chi-square test.
Moimaz SA et al. [46] 2014 Prospective cohort study BMC Oral Health 80 30th months of age Not reported Overjet, Posterior crossbite Self-administered questionnaires at one year, one and a half years and two years of age Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests
Caramez da Silva et al. [35] 2012 Cross-sectional study Breastfeed Med. 153 3 to 5 years old The sagittal relation between the upper and lower jaw was evaluated through direct clinical examination Distoclusion was diagnosed according to Foster and Hamilton’s criteria [43] (the cusp of the primary upper canine occluded anterior to the distal aspect of the primary lower canine. Primary teeth sagittal relationship Trained research assistants gathered data on dietary and not-nutritive sucking habits at 7, 30, 60, 120, and 180 days through a telephonic or in person interview (if the first option was not viable) Poisson’s regression analysis.
Thomaz et al. [47] 2012 Cross-sectional study Int J Pediatr otorhinolaryngol. 2060 12–15 years old Malocclusion and facial characteristics were evaluated as defined by Angle Dental class as described by Angle Validated questionnaire. Odds ratio (OR) in multinomial logistic regression analysis
Jabbar NS et al. [2] 2011 Epidemiological study, cross-sectional study Braz Oral Res. 911 3–6 years Self-defined criteria statistically validated
(Kappa: 0.9 to 1.0)
Overjet (normally, increased, anterior crossbite).
Primary canine relationships (Class 1,2,3)
One-time validated questionnaire. multiple binary logistic regression (α = 0.05)
Romero CC et al. [3] 2011 Cross-sectional study J Appl Oral Sci 1377 3–6 years Clinical examinations were performed by visual inspection. Overbite alterations: anterior open bite (negative overbite) and anterior deep bite (increased overbite) Validated questionnaire. Spearman’s correlation test., chi-square tests with odds ratio (OR), binary logistic regression
Sanchez Molins et al. [48] 2010 Observational, analytical and retrospective study Eur J Paediatr Dent 197 6–11years Cephalometric measurements according to Ricketts, Steiner and McNamara. Dental, skeletal and aesthetics variables based on Ricketts, Steiner and McNamara values. Validated questionnaire. t-test and ANOVA test, chi-square test
Castelo PM et al. [49] 2010 Cross-sectional study J Appl Oral Sci. 67 3.5 to 7 years Direct clinical examination of allowed to gather the following information: anamneses, height and weight, posterior crossbite, distoclusion was diagnosed according to Foster and Hamilton’s criteria [43] (the cusp of the primary upper canine occluded anterior to the distal aspect of the primary lower canine). Cross-bite, maximal bite force. Direct clinical examination and interview of the guardians about history of breastfeeding, presence and duration of sucking habits. t-test,
Pearson’s correlation test
multiple logistic regression
univariate regression
Peres KG et al. [33] 2007 Cross-sectional study Rev Saude Publica. 359 Not reported Direct clinical examination Anterior open bite and posterior cross bite Repeated interview of the guardians about breastfeeding and non-nutritive sucking habits were performed at birth, after 3, 6 and 12 months, and at six years of age Chi-square test,
Poisson regression test
Viggiano D et al. [10] 2004 Retrospective study Arch Dis. Child. 1130 3–5 years Direct clinical examination by a pediatric dentist Altered sagittal relationship; anterior open bite; posterior cross-bite Structured ques-tionnaire Logistic regression,
odds ratio

Significance threshold was set for all studies at p < 0.05.