Table 2.
Item | Dietary Treatments 1 | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON | AGP | CBN | CBH | ||
Body weight, kg | |||||
Initial | 8.09 ± 0.01 | 8.09 ± 0.01 | 8.10 ± 0.005 | 8.09 ± 0.01 | 0.376 |
Day 14 | 10.18 ± 0.24 | 10.43 ± 0.14 | 10.24 ± 0.16 | 10.15 ± 0.10 | 0.293 |
Day 28 | 14.11 ± 0.49 | 14.57 ± 0.55 | 14.33 ± 0.17 | 14.04 ± 0.33 | 0.416 |
Days 1–14 | |||||
ADFI 3, kg | 0.325 ± 0.035 | 0.333 ± 0.016 | 0.303 ± 0.019 | 0.294 ± 0.016 | 0.284 |
ADG 3, kg | 0.161 ± 0.019 | 0.180 ± 0.011 | 0.164 ± 0.012 | 0.158 ± 0.007 | 0.302 |
F/G 3 | 2.03 ± 0.07 a | 1.86 ± 0.05 b | 1.85 ± 0.05 b | 1.85 ± 0.03 b | 0.035 |
Average fecal score | 2.22 ± 0.07 a | 1.67 ± 0.12 c | 1.87 ± 0.02 b,c | 2.02 ± 0.07 a,b | 0.001 |
Days 15–28 | |||||
ADFI, kg | 0.513 ± 0.036 | 0.517 ± 0.043 | 0.466 ± 0.019 | 0.468 ± 0.015 | 0.304 |
ADG, kg | 0.256 ± 0.025 | 0.271 ± 0.033 | 0.268 ± 0.016 | 0.246 ± 0.015 | 0.510 |
F/G | 2.02 ± 0.11 a | 1.94 ± 0.09 a,b | 1.75 ± 0.06 b | 1.92 ± 0.08 a,b | 0.051 |
Average fecal score | 2.09 ± 0.15 a | 1.69 ± 0.09 b | 1.70 ± 0.07 b | 1.97 ± 0.09 a,b | 0.034 |
Days 1–28 | |||||
ADFI, kg | 0.416 ± 0.033 | 0.422 ± 0.026 | 0.382 ± 0.011 | 0.380 ± 0.014 | 0.254 |
ADG, kg | 0.207 ± 0.018 | 0.224 ± 0.020 | 0.214 ± 0.006 | 0.202 ± 0.011 | 0.352 |
F/G | 2.01 ± 0.07 a | 1.90 ± 0.06 a,b | 1.78 ± 0.03 b | 1.89 ± 0.05 a,b | 0.067 |
Average fecal score | 2.16 ± 0.07 a | 1.67 ± 0.10 b | 1.79 ± 0.04 b | 2.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.001 |
a–c Different superscripts within a row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05). 1 Dietary treatments: CON = basal diet; AGP = basal diet supplemented with 0.075 g/kg chlortetracycline, 0.055 g/kg kitasamycin, and 0.01 g/kg virginiamycin; CBN = basal diet supplemented with 2.5 × 108 CFU/kg C. butyricum; CBH = basal diet supplemented with 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg C. butyricum. 2 SE: standard error of the mean. Each treatment group contains six replicates (n = 6), and each replicate includes five piglets. 3 ADFI: average daily feed intake; ADG: average daily gain; F/G: ratio of feed to weight gain.