Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 5;9(12):3949. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123949

Table 1.

Bivariate analysis of the sociodemographic, clinical, and functional variables that may predict suboptimal peak inspiratory flow.

Total
(n = 122)
Adequate PIF
(n = 88)
Sub-Optimal PIF
(n = 34)
p Value *
Males 106 (87%) 76 (86%) 30 (88%) 0.99
Age (years) 68 ± 10 67 ± 10 72 ± 10 0.09
Primary education 78 (64%) 53 (60%) 25 (74%) 0.17
Active smoking 49 (40%) 34 (39%) 15 (44%) 0.58
BMI (Kg/m2) 28.4 ± 5.6 28.4 ± 5.4 28.5 ± 6.1 0.9
Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (mL) 1350 ± 528 1387 ± 562 1129 ± 371 0.04
FEV1 (%) 47 ± 16 49 ± 17 43 ± 14 0.08
Forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL) 2852 ± 908 3005 ± 982 2456 ± 500 <0.01
FVC (%) 77 ± 18 80 ± 19 70 ± 12 <0.01

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or absolute (relative) frequencies according to the nature of the variable. * Calculated using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Student t tests for quantitative variables with independent data. BMI: body mass index. FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1 s. FVC: forced vital capacity.