Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):945. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120945

Table 2.

Group studies involving patients with transient epileptic amnesia (TEA). Ordered in descending number of TEA patients involved. Information that was lacking or is not applicable is presented as blank cells. AEDs—antiepileptic drugs, GKMDT—Graham–Kendall Memory for Designs test, M/F—male/female, RAVLT—Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, ROCF—Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, SD—standard deviation, WMS-III-LM—Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition-Logical Memory.

Reference Epilepsy Type Controls (M/F) Patients (M/F) Patient Age (SD) AEDs Experiences Seizures? Mean, SD if Indicated Material ALF Detected? Delay Points Comment
Savage, Butler, Milton, Han, & Zeman, 2017 [43] TEA 38/12 42/13 70.59 (8.14) Yes, mean number of attacks 17.85 (18.05) RAVLT Yes 30 min, 1 week Olfactory hallucination and reduction in olfactory function more frequent in TEA.
Mosbah et al., 2014 [44] TEA 15 18/12 1 no AEDs 24 on monotherapy 5 on polytherapy Yes WMS-III-LM ROCF Single items recognition Yes (WMS-III-LM, ROCF) 1 h, 6 weeks Neurometabolic correlates for ALF in the medial temporal lobe.
Hoefeijzers, Zeman, Della Sala, & Dewar, 2019 [45] TEA 14/18 20/7 66.44 (9.48) 27 on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Incidental story recall and recognition Yes 30 min, 1 week
Butler et al., 2007 [46] TEA 24 34/16 (24 tested for ALF) 68 (8.7) Yes, 48 on monotherapy No (between sessions) RAVLT GKMDT Yes (both tests) 30 min, 1 week, 3 weeks
Butler et al., 2013 [47] TEA 20 28/13 (22 tested for ALF) 67.7 (8.9) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Word, prose, and design recall Yes 30 min, 1 week, 3 weeks No significant structural MRI correlates with ALF
Butler et al., 2009 [48] TEA 20 28/13 (22 tested for ALF) 67.7 (8.9) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Word, prose, and design recall Yes 30 min, 1 week, 3 weeks Bilateral hippocampal volumes smaller in patients
Dewar, Hoefeijzers, Zeman, Butler, & Della Sala, 2015 [49] TEA 8/8 12/4 69.63 (6.33) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Picture recognition test No 5 min, 2.5 h, 7.5 h, 24 h, 1 week In TEA patients, picture recognition impaired after 5 min with no acceleration in rate afterwards
Butler, Kapur, Zeman, Weller, & Connelly, 2012 [50] TEA 8/12 12/10 66.4 (8.8) Yes No (during study) RAVLT Yes 30 min, 1 week Hippocampal volumetry not related to ALF
Hoefeijzers, Dewar, Della Sala, Zeman, & Butler, 2013 [51] TEA 7/11 9/8 65.47 (8.79) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Word recall (reanalysis of Butler et al., 2007 [46]) Yes 30 min, 1 week, 3 weeks Support for ALF as a consolidation issue
Atherton, Filippini, Zeman, Nobre, & Butler, 2019 [52] TEA 10/5 12/3 67.73 (1.63) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Digital image recognition RAVLT Yes (RAVLT) 30 min, 1 week Significant fMRI results (hypoactive left hippocampus prior forgetting)
Savage et al., 2019 [53] TEA 7/5 9/5 78.3 (7.0) 1 no AEDs 13 on monotherapy At T2: No (stable): 9 Yes: 5 RAVLT Story recall GKMDT Yes (story recall, GKMDT) 30 min, 1 week 10-year follow-up (4 converters ALF to no ALF, but 0 converters from no ALF to ALF)
Hoefeijzers, Dewar, Sala, Butler, & Zeman, 2015 [54] TEA 8/8 10/1 69.82 (5.60) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) 4 Word Lists, recall and recognition Yes 30 min, 3 h, 8 h, 24 h, 1 week Evidence of ALF from 3 to 8 h post-learning
Atherton, Nobre, Zeman, & Butler, 2014 [55] and Atherton et al., 2016 [56] TEA 7/5 10/1 67.73 (1.63) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 6 months) Word pairs association Yes 30 min, 12 h Sleep promotes memory retention in ALF
Muhlert, Milton, Butler, Kapur, & Zeman, 2010 [57] TEA 1/10 10/1 68.6 (9.9) Yes, on monotherapy No (past 4 months) Word recall Real-life event SenseCam test Yes (both tests) 30 min, 1 day, 1 week, 3 weeks
Manes, Graham, Zeman, De Luján Calcagno, & Hodges, 2005 [58] TEA 7 6/1 57 (8.1) Yes, on monotherapy No Story recall and recognition Drawing recall and recognition Yes (story tests) 30 min, 6 weeks