Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;14:4459–4468. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S288047

Table 1.

Comparison of Clinical Parameters Between the SCLs

Narafilcon A (10 Eyes) Samfilcon A (10 Eyes) p value
CA (degree) 8.52±0.25 (8.36–8.67) 7.80±0.29 (7.62–7.97) 0.0030
TMH (mm) 0.13±0.04 (0.10–0.15) 0.14±0.03 (0.12–0.15) 0.7655
J-CLDEQ-8 2.40±4.12 (−0.15–4.95) 4.40±4.33 (1.73–7.06) 0.2208
CDVA (log MAR) −0.05±0.10 (−0.11–0.01) −0.04±0.07 (−0.08–0.00) 0.2633
FVA (log MAR) 0.01±0.03 (0.00–0.03) 0.00±0.02 (−0.01–0.01) 0.4224
VMR (%) 0.98±0.03 (0.96–0.99) 0.97±0.04(0.94–0.99) 0.4537
Blink Rate (frequency/minute) 17.90±10.12 (11.62–24.17) 21.20±6.92 (16.91–25.48) 0.2472

Notes: The data are expressed as the average±deviation (95% confidence interval). Compared with narafilcon A, the CA differ significantly in the samfilcon A.

Abbreviations: log MAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; CA, contact angle; TMH, tear meniscus height; J-CLDEQ-8, Japanese version of the 8-item contact lens dry eye questionnaire; CDVA, corrected distance visual acuity; FVA, functional visual acuity; VMR, visual maintenance rate.