Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 25.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2020 Mar 28;47(6):2472–2483. doi: 10.1002/mp.14121

Table I.

Numerical comparison among CBCT, sCT generated by U-Net, with and without AG

CBCT U-Net CycleGAN CycleGAN with AC
MAE (HU) 81.06 ± 15.86 66.71 ± 15.82 63.72 ± 10.55 56.89 ± 13.84
SNU 0.25 ± 0.097 0.19 ± 0.088 0.15 ± 0.096 0.12 ± 0.085
PSNR (dB) 22.89 ± 2.89 28.17 ± 3.34 25.69 ± 3.40 28.80 ± 2.46
NCC 0.85 ± 0.081 0.87 ± 0.033 0.94 ± 0.040 0.96 ± 0.022
SSIM 0.60 ± 0.063 0.56 ± 0.085 0.70 ± 0.044 0.71 ± 0.032

AG, attention gate; CBCT, cone-beam CT; MAE, mean absolute error; PSNR, peak signal to noise ratio; SNU, spatial nonuniformity; sCT, synthetic CT.