Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 12;9(12):1854. doi: 10.3390/foods9121854

Table 4.

Linearity, matrix effect and limits for atropine and scopolamine in different samples.

Atropine Scopolamine
Sample Linearity (mg/L) Matrix Matched
Calibration
(R2)
Cm *
(%)
MDL *
(µg/kg)
MQL *
(µg/kg)
ME *
(%)
Matrix Matched
Calibration
(R2)
Cm
(%)
MDL
(µg/kg)
MQL
(µg/kg)
ME
(%)
Co-RFC 0.002–1 8.6 × 108x −8.5 × 106
(0.998)
98 0.1 0.4 17 a 3.3 × 108x + 4.3 × 104
(0.999)
94 0.2 0.7 1 d
So-FO 0.01–0.2 7.1 × 108x −3.9 × 106
(0.996)
98 0.5 1.5 −3 a 3.0 × 108x +6.0 × 105
(0.999)
99 0.7 2.4 −7 d
Te-FO 0.01–0.2 7.0 × 108x −1.24 × 107
(0.994)
92 0.04 0.1 −5 a 2.9 × 108x +3.2 × 104
(0.994)
98 1 3.3 −11 d
Co-FO 0.002–1 8.3 × 108x −5.8 × 106
(0.997)
97 0.1 0.4 14 a 3.1 × 108 −4.92 × 106
(0.996)
96 0.2 0.7 −5 d
Pe-FC 0.01–0.4 5.6 × 108x −1.1 × 107
(0.993)
95 0.3 1.1 −35 b 2.1 × 108x −2.7 × 106
(0.993)
98 1.3 4.4 −51 e
Am-GO 0.01–1 3.62 × 108x +1.18 × 106
(1.000)
96 0.2 0.5 −51 c 1.0 × 108x +1.4 × 106
(0.996)
96 0.5 1.7 −69 f

* Cm: Linearity coefficient. MDL: Method detection limit. MQL: Method quantification limit. ME: Matrix effect. Different superscript letters in the same column indicated significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).