Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;5(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30309-6

Table 3.

Interactions between adolescent IQ and adversities, and modifying effects of nurturing care in the home

Interaction Nurturing environment
Low Medium High
Learning and total adversities (Pelotas) 1·74 (0·66), 95% CI 0·43–3·04, p=0·0092 –6·66 (1·88), p<0·0001 –3·18 (1·46), p=0·030 0·30 (2·06), p=0·89
Learning and environmental adversities (Pelotas) 1·73 (0·63), 0·47–2·98, p=0·0070 –6·46 (1·75), p<0·0001 –3·01 (1·39), p=0·032 0·45 (2·0), p=0·82
Responsive caregiving and child adversities (Bt20+) 2·24 (0·66), 95% CI 0·94–3·54, p=0·0075 –5·4 (2·3), p=0·020 –0·95 (1·79), p=0·59 3·53 (2·14), p=0·099

Data are b (SE), 95% CI, p value, or b (SE) p value. Low, medium, or high nurturing environments represent values at –2 Z score, mean, and +2 Z score, respectively. Pelotas=1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort. Bt20+=Birth to Twenty Plus Birth Cohort. IQ=intelligence quotient.