Table A4.
Binary Logistic Regressions of Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Child’s Habit of Cycling to School based on the Sample of Parents.
| Socio-Demographic Characteristics | Mothers | Mothers and Fathers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | OR | 95% CI for OR | p | OR | 95% CI for OR | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Gender | ||||||||
| (a) mothers (ref.) | ||||||||
| (b) fathers | 0.807 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 4.8 | ||||
| Age (in years) | 0.349 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.265 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| Age of child (in years) | 0.103 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 8.8 | 0.228 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 4.8 |
| Gender of child | 0.445 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 7.9 | 0.308 | 2 | 0.5 | 8 |
| (a) daughter | ||||||||
| (b) son (ref.) | ||||||||
| Educational level/school’s region of child | ||||||||
| (a) high/urban (ref.) | ||||||||
| (b) intermediate/suburban | 0.036 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 37.5 | 0.01 | 9.4 | 1.7 | 51 |
| Number of inhabitants | ||||||||
| (a) city (ref.) | ||||||||
| (b) medium-sized town | 0.029 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 45 | 0.008 | 10.6 | 1.9 | 60.2 |
| (c) small town | 0.413 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 54.8 | 0.313 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 70.8 |
| Cycling distance home/school of child (in km) | 0.02 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 0.006 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| Employment status | ||||||||
| (a) yes (ref.) | ||||||||
| (b) no | 1 | 1 | 0.1 | 12.4 | 0.974 | 1 | 0.1 | 12.7 |
| Work (in days/week) | 0.739 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.764 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Cycling to work (habit) | ||||||||
| (a) yes (ref.) | ||||||||
| (b) no | 0.103 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 26.7 | 0.043 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 32.9 |
| Cycling to work (in days/week) | 0.130 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.063 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1 |
| Cycling distance home/work (in km) | 0.586 | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.779 | 1 | 1 | 1.1 |
CI = confidence interval; km = kilometer; OR = odds ratio; p = probability value; ref. = reference value.