Table 4.
Overview of the performance of different diagnostic approaches in doubtful qualitative analysis.
| Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) |
Specificity (%) (95% CI) |
Accuracy (%) (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| T/B20h > T/B3h 5% | 77.8 (58.6–97.0) | 43.8 (29.7–57.8) | 53.0 (41.0–65.1) |
| T/B20h > T/B3h 10% | 72.2 (51.5–92.9) | 66.7 (53.3–80.0) | 68.2 (56.2–79.4) |
| T/B20h > T/B3h 15% | 66.7 (44.9–88.4) | 75.0 (62.8–87.3) | 72.7 (62.0–83.5) |
| T/B20h > T/B3h 20% | 66.7 (44.9–88.4) | 85.4 (75.4–95.4) | 80.3 (70.7–89.9) |
| T/B20h > T/B3h 30% | 33.3 (11.6–55.1) | 93.8 (86.9–100) | 77.3 (67.2–87.4) |
| BMS | 84.6 (65.0–100) | 93.0 (85.4–100) | 91.1 (83.6–98.5) |
T/B: target/background ratio (using contralateral tissue as background); BMS: bone marrow scintigraphy; CI: confidence interval.