Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):3770. doi: 10.3390/nu12123770

Table 1.

Synthesis of results.

Study [Ref] Level of Evidence Population Protocol Energy Balance Metabolic Effect Other Results
R1
Antoni et al. 2018
[27]
Low n = 13
Healthy adults,
29–57 years.
↓ Food window of 3 h
10-week non-randomized controlled trial.
↓ daily energy intake ↓ body 1.9% fat mass index
↓ fasting blood glucose
Only 19% withdrawal including one lost to follow-up
R2
Jamshed et al. 2019
[28]
Medium n = 11
Healthy adults,
32 ± 7 years.
Early TRE 6/18
4-day randomized controlled iso-caloric crossover trial with 3.5 to 5 weeks of wash-out
No difference in calorie intake (iso-caloric) ↓ 24-h glucose and hyperglycemic excursion
↓ insulin resistance
↑ total cholesterol, LDLc, HDLc
↑ BDNF
↓ IGF1
Modification of genes expressions involved in circadian rhythm, longevity, autophagy
R3
Smith et al. 2017
[29]
Low n = 20
Healthy women,
21.3 ± 1.2 years.
Delayed TRE 8/16
4-week single-arm trial
graphic file with name nutrients-12-03770-i001.jpg ↓ body mass of 0.6 ± 1 kg
↓ body fat in participants that strength trained (>3 day/week)
R4
Sutton et al. 2018
[30]
Medium n = 8
Pre-diabetic overweighted men,
59 ± 9 years.
Early TRE 6/18
5-week controlled, randomized, isocaloric crossover trial with 7 weeks of wash-out
No difference in calorie intake (iso-caloric) ↓ insulin (fasting, mean and peak)
↑ insulin sensitivity
↓ insulin resistance
↑ triglycerides
↓ blood pressure
↓ desire to eat
↓ 8-isoprostane
R5
Ravussin et al. 2019
[31]
Medium n = 11
Healthy adults,
32 years.
Early TRE 6/18
4-day controlled, randomized, iso-caloric crossover trial with 3.5 to 5 weeks of wash-out
No difference in calorie intake (standardized meals)
Energy expenditure unchanged
graphic file with name nutrients-12-03770-i001.jpg ↓ several aspects of hunger
↓ in morning ghrelin, leptin and GLP-1
↓ average ghrelin
↑ in evening PYY (satiety)
R6
Gabel et al. 2019
[32]
Low n = 23
Obese,
50 ± 2 years.
TRE 8/16
12-week single-arm trial.
Physical activity unchanged.
No measure of calorie intake
↓ 4% weight
↓ 5% fat mass
80% mean adherence.
R7 and 9
Gabel et al. 2018, 2014
[33,34]
Low n = 23
Obese,
50 ± 2 years.
Delayed TRE 8/16
12-week, non-randomized controlled trial with matched historical group.
↓ of 350 kcal/day
Physical activity unchanged.
↓ 2.6% of relative weight
↓ of relative BMI
↓ systolic blood pressure of 7 ± 2 mmHg
74% adherence rate. No one in the TRE group reported dropping out due to issues with the diet.
R8
Moro et al. 2016
[35]
Medium n = 34
Adults who strength train,
29.21 ± 3.8 years.
TRE 8/16 + RT
8-week randomized controlled trial.
TRE + RT vs. RT
No difference in calorie intake between groups
No difference in physical activity during training sessions
↓ fat mass
↓ blood glucose levels
↓ insulin resistance
↓ triglycerides
↓ TNF-α
↓ IL-1 β
↓ IGF 1
↑ adiponectin
↓ respiratory ratio (lipid oxidation)
Conservation of muscular mass and strength
R10
Anton et al. 2019
[36]
Low n = 10
Overweighted elderly adults,
77.1 years.
TRE 8/16
4-week single-arm trial.
graphic file with name nutrients-12-03770-i001.jpg Mean weight ↓ of 2.6 kg ↑ walking speed
Improvement in mental and physical function.
84% mean adherence.
R11
Hutchison et al. 2019
[37]
Medium n = 15
Pre-diabetic men,
55 ± 3 years.
dTRE 9/15 vs. eTRE
1-week cross-over, randomized trial with 2 weeks of wash-out
No difference in physical activity
No measure of calorie intake
↓ glucose AUC and mean fasting glucose in eTRE
↓ triglycerides in two groups
No effect of TRF on perceived hunger, fullness, or desire to eat.
R12
Tinsley et al. 2016
[38]
Medium n = 18
Adults who strength-train,
22 ± 2.4 years.
TRE 4/20 + RT vs. RT alone.
8-week randomized controlled trial.
↓ of 650 kcal/day between fasting days and non-fasting days
↓ weekly calorie intake
No significant change in weight and fat mass Conservation of lean mass, muscular volume and muscular strength.
95% mean adherence.
R13
Gasmi et al. 2017
[39]
Medium n = 40
20 y (n = 40) vs. 50 years (n = 20)
TRE 12/12:
TRE 50 years + 20 years
Control 50 years + 20 years
12-week randomized, controlled trial.
No difference in calorie intake. No change in body composition and muscular function ↓ immuno-senescence
R14
Tinsley et al. 2019
[40]
Medium n = 40
Women who strength-train
18–30 years.
Delayed TRE 8/16
8-week randomized controlled trial.
-RT + placebo
-TRE + RT + placebo
-TRE + RT + HMB
↑ calorie intake from 20 to 200 kcal/day
No difference in physical activity and REE
↓ fat mass of 4%–7% in per protocol analysis for the 2 TRE groups No side effects in 90% of participants at the end of the protocol
R15
Gill et al. 2015
[41]
Low n= 8
Obese adults,
18 years.
TRE 10/14 every day,
3-week single-arm trial.
Smartphone-based assessment of caloric quantity and timing intake
↓ calorie intake of 20% ↓ weight by 4%
↓ BMI by 1.15 kg/m2
↑ sleep quality
↓ hunger
R16
Lee et al. 2020
[42]
Low n = 10
Overweight sedentary elderly adults,
77.1 years.
TRE 8/16 every day with self-selection of eating window.
4-week single-arm trial.
graphic file with name nutrients-12-03770-i001.jpg graphic file with name nutrients-12-03770-i001.jpg Mean adherence of 84%.
R17
Kesztyüs et al. 2019
[43]
Low n = 40
Abdominally obese,
49.1 ± 12.4 years.
TRE 8/16 every day with self-selection of the food intake period
12-week single-arm trial.
graphic file with name nutrients-12-03770-i001.jpg ↓ weight of 1.7 ± 2.5 kg
↓ BMI of 0.6 ± 0.9 kg/m2
↓ WC −5.3 ± 3.2 cm
↓ HbAc1 by 1.4 ± 3.5 mmol/mol
Mean adherence of 86 ± 15%
R18
Wilkinson et al. 2020
[44]
Low n = 19
Adults with MetS
59 ± 11 years.
TRE 10/14 every day with self-selection of the food intake period.
12-week single-arm trial.
↓ by 8.62% ± 14.47%.
No difference in physical activity.
↓ body weight (−3%)
↓ BMI (−3%)
↓ body fat (−3%)
↓ visceral fat rating (−3%)
↓ WC-4.46 ± 6.72 cm
↓ total cholesterol
↓ LDLc, ↓ non-HDLc
↓ systolic and diastolic BP
Mean adherence of 85 ± 12%.
63.2% participants were somehow engaged in TRE at 16 ± 4 months.
↑ in sleep duration by 12.45 min.
↑ in sleep duration and efficiency in 84% of participants.
R19
McAllister et al. 2019
[45]
Medium n = 22
Physically active men,
22 ± 2.5 years.
TRE 8/16 every day ad libitum vs. Isocaloric (↓ 300 kcal from baseline).
4-week randomized controlled trial.
No difference in calorie intake ↓ body mass in both groups
↓ body fat mass in both groups
↓ systolic BP in both groups
↑ HDLc in both groups
↑ adiponectin in both groups.
Improvement in subjective outcomes (alertness, energy, focus, mood) in ad libitum.
R20
Chow et al. 2020
[46]
Low n = 20
Overweight adults with prolonged eating window (15.4 ± 0.9 h/day).
45.5 ± 12 years.
TRE 8/16 ad libitum every day.
12-week controlled non-randomized trial.
TRE 8/16 group vs. non-TRE group.
No difference in physical activity.
No measure of calorie intake.
(1) vs. non-TRE group
↓ body weight
↓ lean mass
↓ visceral fat
(2) vs. preintervention measures
↓ body weight
↓ fat mass
↓ lean mass
↓ visceral fat
↓ of eating window in TRE group (9.9 ± 2 h) compared with non-TRE group.
Adherence in TRE: 83.1%
Correlation between restriction of eating window with fat and visceral masses loss
R21
Parr et al. 2020
[47]
Medium n = 11
Overweight/obese and sedentary men.
38 ± 5 years.
TRE 8/16 every day vs. non-TRE (15 h/day).
5-day randomized crossover trial with a 10-day wash out period.
No difference in calorie intake (iso-caloric).
No difference in physical activity.
↓ nocturnal glucose AUC TRE group
↓ peak insulin concentrations at breakfast in TRE group
↓ peak glucose concentration at breakfast in TRE group
100% adherence. Improvement of subjective feelings (well-being and satisfaction)
↓ evening hunger in TRE group
R22
Parr et al. 2020
[48]
Low n = 19
Obese adults with T2D.
50 ± 9 years.
TRE 9/15 every day.
4-week singe-arm non-randomized trial
No difference in calorie intake.
Adherence to TRE reduces calorie intake.
NS. Mean compliance of 72 ± 24% (≅5 days/week).
R23
Miguet et al. 2020
[49]
High n = 105
Overweight and obese adults.
46.5 ± 10.5 years.
dTRE 8/16 every day.
12-week controlled randomized trial.
TRE 8/16 vs. control group.
No difference in calorie intake.
No measure of physical activity.
↓ body weight in TRE group (1.17%) compared to baseline that was not significantly different from control group (0.75%).

☒: No measurement. NS: non-significant modification (p > 0.05). Abbreviations: AUC: area under the curve; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; BP: blood pressure; HDLc: HDL cholesterol; HMB: hydroxy-methyl-butyrate supplementation; IL: interleukin; insulin R: insulin resistance; insulin-S: insulin sensitivity; LDLc: LDL cholesterol; MetS: metabolic syndrome; REE: resting energy expenditure; RT: resistance training; T2D: type 2 diabetes; WC: waist circumference.