Table 1.
Natural Hydrogels | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | Hydrogel Used | Type of Study | Hydrogel Modification | Hydrogel Properties | Cells Used | Upregulated Biological Molecules | Outcomes |
Collagen Hydrogel | |||||||
Souron et al., 2014 [104] | Collagen | In vivo | 3D collagen matrices, mimic in vivo cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions, and regulate cell growth | Rat pulp cells labeled with indium-111-oxine | 1 month following implantation, active fibroblasts, new blood vessels and nervous fibers were present in the cellularized 3D collagen hydrogel. | ||
Kwon et al., 2017 [60] | Collagen | In vitro | Crosslinked with cinnamaldehyde (CA). | Crosslinked collagen with shorter gelation time enhances cellular adhesion. Higher stiffness enhances odontogenic differentiation. | Human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) | Dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), Dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP-1), Matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (MEPE), Osteonectin (ON) |
CA shortened the setting time, increased compressive strength and surface roughness of collagen hydrogels. CA-crosslinked hydrogels promoted the proliferation and odontogenic differentiation of human DPSCs |
Pankajakshan et al., 2020 [61] | Collagen | In vitro | Varying hydrogel stiffnesses through varying oligomer concentrations. Incorporation of Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) into 235 Pa collagen or Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) into the 800 Pa ones. |
Stiffness affect cytoskeletal organization and cell shape and specify stem cell lineage. | DPSCs | von Willebrand Factor (vWF), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1), vascular endothelial-cadherin |
Collagen hydrogels with tunable stiffness supported cell survival, and favored differentiation of cells to a specific lineage. DPSCs cultured in 235 Pa matrices showed an increased expression of endothelial markers, cells cultured in 800 Pa showed increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and Alizarin S staining. |
Gelatin Hydrogel | |||||||
Kikuchi et al., 2007 [84] | Gelatin hydrogel | In vivo | Crosslinked gelatin hydrogel microspheres were impregnated with fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) and mixed with collagen sponge pieces. | Gelatin hydrogel microspheres (the water content is 95 vol%; diameters ranged from 5–15 µm; the average of diameter was 10 µm) |
DSPP | Controlled release of FGF2 from gelatin hydrogels induced the formation of dentin-like particles with dentin defects above exposed pulp. | |
Ishimatsu et al., 2009 [117] | Gelatin hydrogel | In vivo | Gelatin hydrogel microspheres incorporating FGF-2. | Gelatin hydrogel microspheres (the water content is 95 vol%, the average diameter was 10 µm) |
DMP-1 | Dentin regeneration on amputated pulp can be regulated by adjusting the dosage of FGF-2 incorporated in biodegradable gelatin hydrogels. | |
Nageh et al., 2013 [85] | Gelatin hydrogel | Clinical trial | FGF incorporated in gelatin hydrogel. | Acidic gelatin hydrogel microspheres with a mean diameter of 59 µm and 95.2% water content. | Follow-up X-ray revealed an increase in root length and width with a reduction in apical diameter confirming the root’s development. | ||
Bhatnagar et al., 2015 [62] | Gelatin hydrogel | In vitro | enzymatically crosslinked with microbial transglutaminase (mTG). | Hard and soft gelatin–mTG gels consist of 1.125 mL and 1.488 mL of a 10% gelatin solution with 0.375 mL (3:1 (v/v) gelatin: mTG), and 0.012 mL (125:1 (v/v) gelatin: mTG) of mTG respectively |
DPSCs | Osteocalcin (OCN), ALP, DSPP |
Enzymatically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels are a potential effective scaffold for dentin regeneration regardless of matrix stiffness or chemical stimulation using dexamethasone. |
Miyazawa et al., 2015 [63] | Gelatin hydrogel | In vitro In vivo |
Simvastatin-lactic acid grafted gelatin micelles, mixed with gelatin, followed by chemical crosslinking to form gelatin hydrogels. | Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) value of micelles was 79 μg/mL. Water solubilization of Simvastatin 43 wt.%. Simvastatin in the gelatin 3.23 wt.%. The sizes of granules 500 μm with rough surfaces and uniformly sized pores | DPSCs | ALP, Dentin sialoprotein (DSP), BMP-2 |
It is possible to achieve odontoblastic differentiation of DPSCs through the controlled release of Simvastatin from gelatin hydrogel. |
Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogel | |||||||
Athirasala et al., 2017 [68] | Gelatin Methacrylate hydrogel (GelMA) | In vitro | Gelatin with methacrylic anhydride. | GelMA hydrogels of 5, 10 and 15% (w/v) concentrations showed a honeycomb-like structure. Both 10% and 15% hydrogel groups appeared to have smaller pore sizes than 5% GelMA. | Odontoblasts like cells (OD21) and endothelial colony- forming cells | Pre-vascularized hydrogel scaffolds with microchannels fabricated using GelMA is a simple and effective strategy for dentin–pulp complex regeneration. | |
Khayat et al., 2017 [64] | GelMA | In vivo | Gelatin with methacrylic anhydride. | DPSCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) | GelMA hydrogel combined with human DPSC/human umbilical vein endothelial cells as promising pulpal revascularization treatment to regenerate human dental pulp tissues. | ||
Ha et al., 2020 [72] | GelMA | In vitro | Gelatin with methacrylic anhydride hydrogels of increasing concentrations. | Increasing polymer concentrations from 5% to 10% and 15% (w/v), resulting in increasing extents of crosslinking. The elastic moduli of hydrogels, increased with increase in polymer concentration from 1.7 kPa for 5% GelMA to 7 kPa and 16.4 kPa for 10% and 15% GelMA hydrogels, respectively. |
stem cells of the apical papilla (SCAP) | Substrate mechanics and geometry have a statistically significant influence on SCAP response. | |
Park et al., 2020 [65] | GelMA | In vitro | GelMA conjugated with synthetic BMP-2 mimetic peptide prepared into bioink. | GelMA exhibited a ~2 kPa storage modulus (G’) before crosslinking and ~4 kPa after crosslinking. | DPSCs | DSPP, OCN | BMP peptide-tethering bioink could accelerate the differentiation of human DPSCs in 3D bioprinted dental constructs. |
Jang et al., 2020 [67] | GelMA | In vitro In vivo |
Thrombin solution added to GelMA hydrogel. | DPSCs | Gelatin hemostatic hydrogels may serve as a viable regenerative scaffold for pulp regeneration. | ||
Fibrin Hydrogel | |||||||
Meza 2019 [249] | Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) |
Case report | DPSCs | Autologous DPSCs isolated from extirpated autologous inflamed dental pulp were loaded on autologous PRF in lower premolar tooth with irreversible pulpitis for successful regeneration. | |||
Ducret et al., 2019 [123] | Fibrin–chitosan | In vitro | Enriching the fibrin-hydrogel with chitosan. | 10 mg/mL fibrinogen and 0.5% (w/w), 40% DA chitosan, formed a hydrogel at physiological pH (≈7.2), which was sufficiently fluid to preserve its injectability without affecting fibrin biocompatibility | DPSCs | Chitosan imparted antibacterial activity to fibrin hydrogel, reducing E. faecalis growth. The blending of chitosan in fibrin hydrogels did not affect the viability, proliferation and collagen-forming capacity of encapsulated DPSCs as compared to unmodified fibrin. |
|
Mittal et al., 2019 [250] | PRF | Clinical trial | PRF and collagen are better scaffolds than placentrex and chitosan for apexogenesis of immature necrotic permanent teeth. | ||||
Bekhouche et al., 2020 [82] | Fibrin | In vitro | Incorporation of clindamycin loaded Poly (D, L) Lactic Acid nanoparticles (CLIN-loaded PLA NPs). |
Fibrin hydrogel constituted a reservoir of CLIN-loaded PLA NPs inhibiting E. faecalis growth without affecting cell viability and function. | DPSCs | Fibrin hydrogels containing CLIN-loaded PLA NPs showed an antibacterial effect against E. faecalis and inhibited biofilm formation. DPSCs viability and type I collagen synthesis in cellularized hydrogels were similar to the unmodified groups. | |
Renard et al., 2020 [131] | Fibrin-chitosan | In vivo | Same formulation of fibrin–chitosan hydrogel as used by Ducret et al., 2019 [123] | 40% DA chitosan incorporation in the fibrin hydrogel did not modify modify dental pulpi inflammatory/immune response and triggered polarization of pro-regenerative M2 macrophages. | In in vivo model of rat incisor pulpotomy, fibrin–chitosan hydrogels imparted a similar inflammatory response in the amputated pulp as unmodified fibrin. Both groups enhanced the polarization of pro-regenerative M2 macrophages. | ||
Zhang et al., 2020 [71] | Fibrin | In vitro | Fibrin hydrogel loaded with DPSCs-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). | 2 mg/mL fibrinogen formed a hydrogel which was able to retain and preserve the activity of EVs. Forming the most extensive tubular network forming at an EVs concentration of 200 µg/mL | Co-culture of DPSCs and HUVECs | VEGF | Investigated hydrogels enhanced rapid neovascularization under starvation culture, increased deposition of collagen I, III, and IV, and promoted the release of VEGF. |
Matrigel 3D | |||||||
Mathieu et al., 2013 [143] | Matrigel | In vitro | DPSCs | Encapsulating transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-b1) and FGF-2 in a biodegradable Poly glycolide-co-lactide (PGLA) microsphere |
|||
Ito et al., 2017 [77] | Matrigel | In vivo | Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) | Nestin, DSPP | Pulp tissue regeneration was successfully achieved. | ||
Sueyama et al., 2017 [78] | Matrigel | In vivo | BMMSCs and endothelial cells (ECs). | DSPP, Nestin Bcl-2, Cxcl1, Cxcr2, VEGF |
The implantation of ECs with mesenchymal stem cells accelerated pulp tissue regeneration/healing and dentin bridge formation. | ||
Gu et al., 2018 [79] | Matrigel | In vivo | BMMSCs | M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages plays an important role in creating a favorable microenvironment necessary for pulp tissue regeneration. | |||
Kaneko et al., 2019 [80] | Matrigel | In vivo | BMMSCs nucleofected with pVectOZ-LacZ plasmid encoding β-galactosidase |
DSPP | BMMSCs could differentiate into cells involved in mineralized tissue formation in the functionally relevant region. | ||
Keratin Hydrogel | |||||||
Sharma et al., 2016 [69] | Keratin hydrogel | In vitro | Highly branched interconnected porous micro-architecture with a maximum average pore size of 160 µm and minimum pore size of 25 µm. G′ > G″ indicates the elastic solid-like nature of the gel. After 3 months the degradation rate was 68%. |
odontoblast-like cells (MDPC-23) |
ALP, DMP-1 | Keratin enhanced proliferation and odontoblastic differentiation of odontoblast-like cells. Keratin hydrogels may be a potential scaffold for pulp–dentin regeneration. | |
Sharma et al., 2016 [70] | Keratin hydrogel | In vitro In vivo |
Highly branched interconnected porous micro-architecture with a maximum average pore size of 160 µm and minimum pore size of 25 µm. G′ > G′′ indicates the elastic solid-like nature of the gel. After 3 months the degradation rate was 68%. |
odontoblast-like cells (MDPC-23) and DPSCs |
Keratin hydrogel enhanced odontogenic differentiation of odontoblast-like cells and enhanced reparative dentin formation. | ||
Sharma et al., 2017 [150] | Keratin hydrogel | In vivo | Branched interconnected porous micro-architecture with average pore size 163.5 and porosity 82.8%. There was a gradual increase in G’ from 7% to 20% (w/v) gel concentration. The average contact angle was 35.5°. | Keratins hydrogel can be a source for biological treatment options for dentin–pulp complex. | |||
Alginate Hydrogel | |||||||
Dobie et al., 2002 [86] | Alginate | In vitro | TGF- β1 or HCL acid-treatment of the hydrogels. | Alginate hydrogels are valuable for delivery of growth factors (GFs) (or agents to release endogenous GFs) to enhance reparative processes of dentin–pulp complex. | Alginate hydrogel acted as an efficient carrier for TGF- β1. Furthermore, acid treatment of the hydrogel aided in the release of TGF- β1 from dentin matrix. Alginate–TGF–β1 blends stimulated reactionary dentinogenic responses with increased predentin width. | ||
Bhoj et al., 2015 [83] | Alginate | In vitro | Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-modified alginate hydrogels, loaded with VEGF and FGF-2. | RGD–alginate matrix acted as pulp replacement, compatible with the DPSCs and HUVECs, and can deliver VEGF and FGF-2. | Co-culture of DPSCs and HUVECs | Combined addition of FGF and VEGF led to an increased proliferation of both DPSCs and HUVECs in the hydrogels. RGD-modified alginate can efficiently retain VEGF and FGF-2. | |
Smith et al., 2015 [81] | Alginate | In vitro | Alginate hydrogel doped with bovine dental pulp extracellular matrix (pECM). | 3D Alginate hydrogel doped with pECM formed 3D matrices. pECM provides additional signals for differentiation. |
Primary dental pulp cells | Induced differentiation in the mineralizing medium resulted in time-dependent mineral deposition at the periphery of the hydrogel. | |
Verma et al., 2017 [127] | Alginate–fibrin | In vivo | Oxidized alginate–fibrin hydrogel microbeads. | 7.5% oxidized alginate coupled with fibrinogen concentration of 0.1% enhanced microbead degradation, cell release, and proliferation. | DPSCs | Oxidized alginate–fibrin hydrogel microbeads encapsulating DPSCs showed similar regenerative potential to traditional revascularization protocol in ferret teeth. In both groups, the presence of residual bacteria affected root development. | |
Athirasala et al., 2018 [168] | Alginate | In vitro | Blending alginate hydrogels with soluble and insoluble fractions of the dentin matrix as a bioink for 3D printing. | Dentin matrix proteins preserve the natural cell-adhesive (RGD) and MMP-binding sites, which are lacking in unmodified alginate, that are important for viability, proliferation, and differentiation. | SCAP | ALP, Runt-related transcription factor -2 (RUNX2) | Alginate and insoluble dentin matrix (in 1:1 ratio) hydrogels bioink significantly enhanced odontogenic differentiation of SCAP under the effect of the soluble dentin molecules in the hydrogel. |
Yu et al., 2019 [169] | Alginate and gelatin hydrogels | In vitro | 3D bioprinted crosslinked composite alginate and gelatin hydrogels (4% and 20% by weight, respectively). | 3D printing accurately controls the interconnected porosity and pore diameter of the scaffold, and imitate natural cell tissue in vivo. | DPSCs | ALP, OCN, DSPP | 3D-printed alginate and gelatin hydrogels aqueous extracts are more suitable for the growth of DPSCs, and can better promote cell proliferation and differentiation. |
Chitosan Hydrogel | |||||||
Park et al., 2013 [179] | Chitosan hydrogel | In vitro | N-acetylation of glycol chitosan |
Glycol chitosan (0.2 g) and acetic anhydride (0.87 g) were dissolved in 50 mL of a mixture of distilled water and methanol (50/50, v/v) degree of acetylation 90% pore size ranged from 5 to 40 mm. |
Human DPSCs | DSPP, DMP-1, ON, osteopontin |
Glycol chitin-based thermo-responsive hydrogel scaffold promoted the proliferation and odontogenic differentiation of human DPSCs. |
El Ashiry et al., 2018 [182] | Chitosan hydrogel | In vivo | Chitosan 1 g; 77% deacylation, high molecular weight, was dissolved in 2% acetic acid. |
DPSCs | DPSCs and GFs incorporated in chitosan hydrogel can regenerate pulp–dentin-like tissue in non-vital immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis in dogs. |
||
Wu et al., 2019 [180] | Chitosan hydrogel | In vitro | beta-sodium glycerophosphate added to chitosan (CS/β-GP). | viscosity: 200–400 m Pa·s 2% (w/v) chitosan solution 56% (w/v) beta-sodium glycerophosphate (β-GP) solution CS: β-GP is 5/L |
DPSCs | VEGF, ALP, OCN, Osterix, DSPP |
CS/β-GP hydrogel could release VEGF continually and promote odontogenic differentiation of DPSCs. |
Zhu et al., 2019 [181] | Chitosan hydrogel | In vitro | Ag-doped bioactive glass micro-size powder particles added to chitosan (Ag-BG/CS). | Ag-BG/CS pore diameter reaching around 60–120 μm. |
DPSCs | OCN, ALP, RUNX-2 |
Ag-BG/CS enhanced the odontogenic differentiation potential of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory-reacted dental pulp cells and expressed antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity. |
Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel | |||||||
Chrepa et al., 2016 [198] | Hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel | In vitro | SCAP/Restylane 1:10 concentration SCAP/Matrigel mixture at 1:1 concentration 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether; DVS, divinyl sulphone crosslinking agent |
SCAP | ALP, DSPP, DMP-1, MEPE gene | HA injectable hydrogel promoted SCAP survival, mineralization and differentiation into an odontoblastic phenotype. | |
Yang et al., 2016 [193] | Hyaluronic acid hydrogel | In vivo | HA crosslinked with 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether |
HA (1.5 × 106 Da) 1,4-Butanediol diglycidyl ether crosslinking agent HA concentration of 20 mg mL−1 gel particles of 0– 400 mm. |
Dental mesenchymal cells | HA is an injectable scaffold that can regenerate cartilage and dentin–pulp complex. | |
Almeida et al., 2018 [195] | Hyaluronic acid hydrogel | In vitro | Photo crosslinking of methacrylated HA incorporated with PL. | High molecular weight (1.5–1.8 MDa) HA 1% (w/v) HA solution (in distilled water) reacted with methacrylic anhydride (10 times molar excess) methacrylated disaccharides% was 10.9 ± 1.07% HA hydrogels incorporating 100% (v/v) PL Met-HA was dissolved at a concentration of 1.5% (w/v) in both of the PBS and PL photoinitiator solutions. |
Human DPSCs | ALP, collagen type I A 1 strand (COLIA1) | HA hydrogels incorporating PL increased the cellular metabolism and stimulate the mineralized matrix deposition by hDPSCs. |
Silva et al., 2018 [194] | Hyaluronic acid hydrogel | In vitro Ex vivo |
HA hydrogels incorporating cellulose nanocrystals and enriched with Platelet lysate (PL). | 1 wt. % ADH-HA, 1 wt. % a-HA, 0.125 to 0.5 wt. % a-CNCs in 50 v/v% PL solution. | Human DPSCs | HA hydrogel enabled human DPSCs survival and migration. | |
Zhu et al., 2018 [197] | Hyaluronic acid hydrogel | In vivo | Crosslinked HA hydrogel | Crosslinked HA gel (24 mg/mL) mixed with cells at 1:1–1:1.4 (v/v, i.e., gel/cells) ratio with final cell concentration of *2 · 107/mL 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether; DVS, divinyl sulphone crosslinking agent 9% |
DPSCs | Nestin, DSPP, DMP-1, Bone sialoprotein |
HA hydrogel regenerated pulp-like tissue with a layer of dentin-like tissue or osteodentin along the canal walls. |
Niloy et al., 2020 [196] | Hyaluronic acid hydrogel | In vitro | Converting sodium salt of HA into Tetrabutylammonium salt and subsequent conjugation of Aminoethyl methacrylate (AEMA) to HA backbone. | AEMA-HA macromers of two different molecular weights (18 kD and 270 kD) 1 g of H/100 mL deionized water, mixed with 12.5 g of ion exchange resin was converted from its hydrogen form to its TBA form AEMA hydrochloride (0.25 equivalent to HA repeat units) |
DPSCs | NANOG, SOX2 | HA hydrogels have great potential to mimic the in vivo 3D environment to maintain the native morphological property and stemness of DPSCs. |
Agarose Hydrogel | |||||||
Cao et al., 2016 [214] | Agarose hydrogel | In vitro | Calcium chloride (CaCl 2) Agarose hydrogel | 1.0 g of Agarose powder, 1.9 g of CaCl 2 H20 |
Agarose hydrogel promoted occlusion of dentinal tubules and formation of enamel prisms-like tissue on human dentin surface. | ||
Cellulose Hydrogel | |||||||
Teti et al., 2015 [227] | Cellulose hydrogel | In vitro | Hydroxyapatite was loaded inside CMC hydrogel | Degree of carboxymethylation of 95% (CMC) (average MW 700 KDa) | DPSCs | ALP, RUNX2, COL-IA1, SPARC, DMP-1, DSPP |
CMC–hydroxyapatite hydrogel up regulated the osteogenic and odontogenic markers expression and promoted DPSCs adhesion and viability. |
Aubeux et al., 2016 [226] | Cellulose hydrogel | In vitro | Silanes grafted along the hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose chains. | nanoporous macromolecular structure. Pores have an average diameter of 10 nm | TGF-b1 | Cellulose hydrogel enhanced non-collagenous matrix proteins release from smashed dentin powder. | |
Iftikhar et al., 2020 [228] | Cellulose hydrogel | In vitro | The surface area, average pore size and particle size of BAG (45S5 Bioglass®) were 65m2/g 5.7 nm, and 92 nm, respectively. |
MC3T3-E1 cells differentiated into osteoblasts and osteocytes. | The prepared injectable bioactive glass, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) and Pluronic F127 was biocompatible in an in vitro system and has the ability to regenerate dentin. | ||
Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel | |||||||
Chatzistavrou et al., 2014 [246] | Extracellular matrix (ECM) hydrogel | In vitro | silver-doped bioactive glass (Ag-BG) incorporated into ECM | Ag-BG powder form with particle size < 35μm. ECM concentration of 10 mg/mL ECM60/Ag-BG40, ECM50/Ag-BG50, ECM30/Ag-BG70 weight ratio. |
DPSCs | Ag-BG/ECM presented enhanced regenerative properties and anti-bacterial action. | |
Wang et al., 2015 [245] | ECM hydrogel | In vivo In vitro |
silver-doped bioactive glass (Ag-BG) incorporated into ECM | Ag-BG powder form with particle size < 35μm. ECM pepsin digest stock solutions of 10 mg ECM/mL (dry weight) Ag-BG: ECM = 1:1 in wt. %. |
DPSCs | Ag-BG/ECM showed antibacterial property, induced dental pulp cells proliferation and differentiation. The in vivo results supported the potential use of Ag-BG/ECM as an injectable material for the restoration of lesions involving pulp injury. | |
Li et al., 2020 [247] | ECM hydrogel | In vitro | Pre-gel solution was diluted into 0.75% w/v and 0.25% w/v. | Human DPSCs | DSPP, DMP-1 | decellularized matrix hydrogel derived from human dental pulp effectively contributed to promoting human DPSCs proliferation, migration, and induced multi-directional differentiation. |
|
Holiel et al., 2020 [248] | ECM hydrogel | Clinical trial | Human treated dentin matrix hydrogel was dispersed in sodium alginate solution | Particle sized powder (range 350–500 μm) 5% (w/v) of sodium alginate 0.125 g of sterile human treated dentin matrix was dispersed in the sodium alginate solution with a mass ratio of 1:1 |
Treated dentin matrix hydrogel attained dentin regeneration and conservation of pulp vitality. |