Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):977. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120977

Table 3.

Hierarchical linear regression models with proportion of looking time to target post-naming (Model 1) and latency of gaze switch to target (Model 2) as dependent variables.

Model 1: Proportion of Looking Time to Target
Removed covariate R2 = 0.389, F(2, 28) = 8.930, p = 0.001
β SE T P
Vocabulary size 0.327 2.035 0.052
Entered predictor variables
Mean postnatal depression −0.677 0.006 −3.180 0.004 ***
Mean postnatal anxiety 0.076 0.004 0.358 0.723
Model 2: Latency of Gaze Switch to Target
Removed covariate R2 = 0.286, F(2, 18) = 3.609, p = 0.048
β SE T P
Vocabulary size −0.383 0.328 −1.798 0.090
Entered predictor variables
Mean postnatal depression 0.399 5.584 1.429 0.170
Mean postnatal anxiety 0.173 4.234 0.618 0.544

Note. β = standardized regression co-efficient; SE = standard error; T = test statistic; P = probability; Depression = CESD-R scores; Anxiety = STAI scores; *** p < 0.001