Table 5.

Goodness-of-fit indicators of the measurement model, structural model and invariant test model by adolescent gender, family intactness and family economic hardship (Cont’d).

Description	Model	x 2	df	CFI	RMSEA	Model Comparison	Δx2	Δdf	ΔCFI
Invariant test model by family intactness
Unconstrained model	M5a	7869.717 ***	3598	0.893	0.028
Constrained model	M5b	8043.332 ***	3677	0.892	0.028	M5b and M5a	173.615 **	129	0.001
Equality constraint: Paternal concerted cultivation (T1) → Adolescent psychopathology (T2)	M5c	7870.356 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5c and M5a	0.639	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Maternal concerted cultivation (T1) → Adolescent psychopathology (T2)	M5d	7869.773 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5d and M5a	0.057	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Paternal concerted cultivation (T1) → Father-child conflict (T2)	M5e	7869.920 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5e and M5a	0.203	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Paternal concerted cultivation (T1) → Mother-child conflict (T2)	M5f	7869.844 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5f and M5a	0.128	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Maternal concerted cultivation (T1) → Father-child conflict (T2)	M5g	7869.885 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5g and M5a	0.169	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Maternal concerted cultivation (T1) → Mother-child conflict (T2)	M5h	7869.854 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5h and M5a	0.137	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Father-child conflict (T2) → Adolescent psychopathology (T2)	M5i	7869.816 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5i and M5a	0.100	1	0.000
Equality constraint: Mother-child conflict (T2) → Adolescent psychopathology (T2)	M5j	7869.733 ***	3549	0.893	0.028	M5j and M5a	0.016	1	0.000
Invariant test model by economic hardship
Unconstrained model	M6a	7360.654 ***	3548	0.893	0.029
Constrained model	M6b	7513.664 ***	3677	0.892	0.028	M6b and M6a	153.010	129	0.001

** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.