Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 10;9(12):1833. doi: 10.3390/foods9121833

Table 6.

Fructooligosaccharide (FOS) yield and productivity obtained from this study compared to other reports.

Method Reaction Time (h) Fructooligosaccharide Reference
Concentration (g·L−1) Productivity (g·L−1·h−1)
GF2 * GF3 GF4 Total FOS GF2 GF3 GF4 Total FOS
Ultrasonic and microbubble methods 4 264.1 47.8 4.84 316.8 66.0 11.96 1.21 79.2 This study
Ultra-high pressure (UHP) method 0.25 189.72 110.88 28.2 328.8 758.88 443.52 112.8 1315.2 [5]
Conventional methods 5.6 220.8 321.6 60.0 330 39.4 57.4 10.7 58.9 [43]
9 156.98 144.10 84.63 404.0 17.44 16.01 9.40 44.90 [38]
10 155 130 15.0 300 15.5 13.0 1.50 30.0 [40]
6 212.33 106.7 8.58 327.6 35.4 17.78 1.43 54.6 [41]
12 174.2 96.6 26.8 297.7 14.5 8.05 2.24 24.8 [42]

* GF2, 1-Kestose; GF3, Nystose; GF4, 1F-β-fructofuronosylnystose.