Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;10(12):2393. doi: 10.3390/ani10122393

Table 3.

Effect of marinating on texture parameters of roast products.

Parameter Marinating
Time (h)
Non-Marinated Marinated SEM
Group C Group MB Group W
Warner–Bratzler
Shear force (N) 24 32.05 a ± 2.95 28.10 b ± 3.00 29.50 b ± 3.50 0.38
48 33.25 a ± 2.70 30.70 b ± 2.60 30.65 b ± 1.98 0.40
Hardness (N) 24 25.82 a ± 2.26 17.27 b ± 3.00 19.57 b ± 2.08 0.30
48 26.11 a ± 2.02 18.38 b ± 2.00 18.21 b ± 1.88 0.48
Cohesiveness 24 0.35 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.08 0.02
48 0.40 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.05 0.32 ± 0.05 0.03
Springiness (mm) 24 2.06 ± 0.41 2.03 ± 0.61 1.89 ± 0.52 0.06
48 2.29 ± 3.00 2.00 ± 0.40 1.69 ± 0.50 0.05
Gumminess (N) 24 8.98 ± 0.98 5.18 ± 0.76 5.42 ± 0.76 0.03
48 9.12 ± 0.92 5.98 ± 0.76 4.62 ± 0.90 0.04
Chewiness (mJ) 24 17.75 a ± 1.72 11.01 b ± 1.21 10.35 b ± 1.50 0.21
48 19.56 a ± 2.30 9.20 b ± 1.80 11.80 b ± 1.80 0.28

Explanations: C—control group-non-marinated; group MB—marinated in buttermilk; group W—marinated in acid whey; a, b, c—values in rows with different letters differ significantly p < 0.05; x, y—values in columns with different letters differ highly significantly p < 0.05.