Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249395

Table 6.

Narrative review: Characteristics and main results of the community surveys that had assessed the difference in the prevalence of hypertension based on blood pressure measured on ≥two vs. one visits.

First Author
Nb Visits [ref]
Place of Study, Year of Data Collection Sample Size Nb Readings at Each Visit Hypertension Definition Criterion for Subsequent Visit Mean BP Rel. dif. HTN Prevalence
First Visit Last Visit
2 visits
Inamo J [35] Martinique/Guadeloupe/Guyana, 2001–2002 6113 1—2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx ≥140/90, no Rx NA NA −19%
Lang T [36] France, 1997–1998 29,626 1—2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx ≥140/90, no Rx NA NA * −39%
Atallah A [37] Guadeloupe, 2007 CONSANT survey 1005 1—2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx ≥140/90, no Rx NR NR * −25%
Guadeloupe, 2001–2003 PHAPGG survey 20,420 1—2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx ≥140/90, no Rx NR NR * −32%
Modesti PA [38] Yemen, 2009 10,242 2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx All 123.0/76.9 121.5/76.2 −33%
Markovic N [39] Nigeria, 1992 804 2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx All * 120.5/75.4 * 116.9/85.0 NR
Pierce L [40] Haiti, 2012 175 1—2 ≥140/90 or Rx ≥140/90, no Rx NR NR * −20%
Figueiredo D [41] Portugal, 2001–2003 739 1—2 ≥140/90 or Rx All NR NR −13%
≥140/90, no Rx All NR NR −31%
Bovet P [42] Tanzania, 1998–1999 9254 2—3 ≥160/95 All * 147.3/89.3 * 140.2/85.8 −29%
Birkett NJ [11] Canada, 1985–1986 2016 1—2—3/2—3 ≥160/90 or Rx ≥160/90 or Rx NA NA * −12%
3 visits
Lai M [43] China, 2017 1185 1—2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx All NR NR * −12%
Markovic N [39] Nigeria, 1992 804 2—3 ≥140/90 or Rx All * 120.5/75.3 * 115/73.3 * −14%
Birkett NJ [11] Canada, 1985–1986 2016 1—2—3/2—3 ≥160/90 or Rx ≥160/90 or Rx NA NA * −17%
4 visits
Bovet P [42] Tanzania, 1998–1999 9254 2–3 ≥160/95 All * 147.3/89.2 * 136/83.9 −43%

NA: Not applicable; NR: Not reported; BP: Blood pressure; HTN: Hypertension; Rx: Treatment; Rel. dif.: Relative difference; nb: Number; ref: Reference. * Difference in the prevalence of hypertension based on ≥two vs. one visits based on prevalence figures displayed in the article.